MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Decree for restitution of conjugal rights enforces cohabitation but it cannot force Sexual intercourse

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 04, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 07, 2016 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 64/2015 SUDHA GUPTA ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Om Saran Gupta, Advocate versus HAR PRASAD GUPTA ….. Respondent Represented by: Respondent in person CORAM:…

When Challenging decree for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act infructuous

Andhra High Court F.C.A. Nos.176 OF 2008 AND 60 OF 2010 14-07-2014 Smt.K.Kavith… Appellant Shiva Shankar.. Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Dr. P.B. Vijay Kumar Counsel for the respondent:Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu Sri K. Chaitanya <GIST: HEAD NOTE: CASES REFERRED: 1. 1977 AIR 2218 2….

Divorce: Writing, insulting and offensive letters to office, Suicide threats – Cruelty

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE Chittatosh Mookerjee and Mukul Gopal Mukherji Sm. Krishna Sarbadhikary vs Alok Ranjan Sarbadhikary Petition no 119 1982 JUDGEMENT The principal question in this appeal is whether the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Alipore was justified in dissolving the marriage…

Unexplained Delay in lodging complaint

Supreme Court of India PETITIONER:RAM JAG AND OTHERS Vs. RESPONDENT:THE STATE OF U.P. DATE OF JUDGMENT21/12/1973 BENCH:CHANDRACHUD, Y.V.BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH CITATION: 1974 AIR 606 1974 SCR (3) 9 1974 SCC (4) 201 CITATOR INFO : F 1974 SC2165 (27) R 1975 SC 185 (2) F…

Divorce : False Adultery claims Cruelty

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated:21.02.2012 Coram: THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE ELIPE DHARMA RAO AND THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.VENUGOPAL C.M.A.No.2148 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008 P.Nirmala … Appellant Vs. K.Muruguselvam … Respondent Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 282 of the Hindu Marriage…

Refusal to intimacy leads to Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on : 10.10.2013 MAT. APP. (FC) NO.3/2013 & cm 7056/2013 (maintenance),CM 7057/2013(delay) PUSHPA RAJAI ….. Appellant Through : Mr.Jai Bansal, Advocate. Versus JAI PRAKASH LALWANI ….. Respondent Through : Nemo CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh