Joymalya Bagchi – MyNation KnowledgeBase

Section 145, Indian Evidence Act does not apply to prove “omissions” in witness statements during criminal trial

Posted on 05/02/2020 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Present: The Hon’ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi & The Hon’ble Justice Suvra Ghosh CRA 709 of 2014 Md. Irfan & Ors.-vs-The State of West Bengal With CRA 719 of 2014 Md. Akran @ Gabbar @ Gubbar…

Not necessary that accused must be in country to apply for Anticipatory Bail

Posted on 29/08/2019 by MyNation Leave a comment

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE SIDE CRM 127/ 2019 BIMAL GURUNG AND ANR VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND CRM 128/ 2019 BIMAL GURUNG VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL CRM 169/ 2019 BIMAL GURUNG VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL CRM…

Calcutta HC issued directions as ‘standard operating procedure’ for investigation and prosecution of crime

Posted on 18/07/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Calcutta High Court C. R. M. 3697 of 2018 In Re : An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11.06.2018 : A N D State of West Bengal … Petitioner Vs. Sangita Sahu @ Shaw…

Anticipatory bail postulated to SIL underneath Sections 498A/306/304B/34 of a Indian Penal Code.

Posted on 10/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Kamalika Bakshi (Mukherjee) vs Unknown on 8 January, 2018 104 08.01.2018 rkd Ct. No.28 C.R.M. 114 of 2018 (Allowed) In Re: – An focus for anticipatory bail underneath Section 438 of a Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 04/01/2018 in…

Accused fundamental right of free movement including his right to go abroad

Posted on 26/08/2017 by MyNation Leave a comment

Kolkata High Court (Appellete Side) 2199/2013 on 4 December, 2013 Author: Joymalya Bagchi Sri Amarendra Nath Ghosh -Versus- The State of West Bengal & Anr. Citation;2014 AllMR(cri) JOURNAL 211 Order dated 26.04.2013 passed by the learned Special Judge, Special Court, Alipore in Special Case No. 7 of 1998 arising out of R.C. Case No. 6E/1996 rejecting the prayer of the petitioner to go abroad has been challenged. The petitioner claims to be a businessman having various business interests, some…

Enter your email Address

MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: Joymalya Bagchi

Section 145, Indian Evidence Act does not apply to prove “omissions” in witness statements during criminal trial

Not necessary that accused must be in country to apply for Anticipatory Bail

Anticipatory bail postulated to SIL underneath Sections 498A/306/304B/34 of a Indian Penal Code.

Accused fundamental right of free movement including his right to go abroad

STUDY REPORTS

Recent Comments

SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

498A victim Autobiography

MyNation Blog

News

Home Remedies N tips

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away