MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

No Maintenance in case of Mutual Consent Divorce

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN Bench: JUSTICE R.S. Chauhan Shashi alias Mala vs. State and Anr. On 27 March 2006 JUDGEMENT 1. Both these Misc. Petitions arise out of impugned order dated 5.8.02 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities) Cases Addl. Sessions Judge,…

Divorce : Abusive and childish Misbehavior of wife cruelty

GAUHATI HIGH COURT Bench: JUSTICE J.N. Sarma MONIKA HOM ROY Vs. SMARAN ROY On 5 June 2000 Decided On Jun-05-2000 Case Number First Appeal No. 82 of 1995 JUDGEMENT This appeal has been filed by the wife under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act…

Divorce : Best to end marriage that has broken down

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.: Transfer Petition (civil) 228 of 2004 PETITIONER:Sanghamitra Ghosh RESPONDENT:Kajal Kumar Ghosh DATE OF JUDGMENT: 20/11/2006 BENCH:G.P. MATHUR & DALVEER BHANDARI JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T WITH TP (CRL.) NOS.105 & 171 OF 2004, TP (CIVIL)…

498a FIR Quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 6594 of 2015 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ? NO 2 To be referred to the Reporter…

In Mutual Consent Divorce, One spouse can not unilaterally withdraw Consent for Divorce

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.61 OF 2010 Mr.Prakash Alumal Kalandari, Age: 42 years, Occupation: Business, Indian Hindu, at present residing at 1/8 Five Star, Apartments 262,Bund Garden Road,PUNE -411 001. …Appellant Versus Mrs.Jahnavi Prakash Kalandari,…

498A Quash – Party back out from mutual settlement abuse of process of law

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1450/2014 and Crl. M.A. No. 15097/2014 Decided on 3rd February, 2015 SEEMANT SINHA & ORS ….. Petitioners Through :Mr. Manoj Sharma and Mr. Praveen K. Maheshwari, Advs. with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR ……..

Power to waive the statutory period of six months not with court but under Article 142

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.985 of 2016 (O&M) Date of decision:10.02.2016 Aminder Singh … Petitioner Vs. Harpreet Kaur … Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to see judgment?…

Section 13(i)(ia) divorce by mutual consent no time limit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI MAT.APP.(F.C.) 113/2016 SANGEETA ….. Appellant Through : Mr. Manoj Kr. Srivastava and Mr. Anuj Tyagi, Advocates with appellant in person. versus ARUN JOON ….. Respondent Through : Respondent in person. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS….

Pre-existing duty doctrine in Mutual consent of HMA

Supreme Court of India Author: K Shetty Bench: Shetty, K.J. (J) PETITIONER:SMT. SURESHTA DEVI Vs. RESPONDENT:OM PRAKASH DATE OF JUDGMENT07/02/1991 BENCH:SHETTY, K.J. (J),AGRAWAL, S.C. (J) CITATION: 1992 AIR 1904 1991 SCR (1) 274 1991 SCC (2) 25 JT 1991 (1) 321 1991 SCALE (1)156 ACT:…

Careful when compromising in Maintenance

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 11800 OF 2013 [Arising out of C.C. No. 1297 of 2012] Nagendrappa Natikar .. Petitioner Versus Neelamma .. Respondent J U D G M E N T K. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J….

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh