MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Disclosure of interest in information sought under RTI Act necessary to establish bonafides of applicant

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 12th January, 2021 W.P.(C) 7976/2020 HAR KISHAN ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Milind P. Singh, Advocate.(M:9810187151) versus PRESIDENT SECRETARIATT THROUGH: ITS SECRETARY & ANR. ….. Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Abhigyan…

Whether the Internal Complaints Committee can recommend disciplinary action against lady making a complaint of sexual harassment?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 16th December, 2020 W.P.(C) 3249/2017 CMAPPL. 14126/2017 BIBHA PANDEY Vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH 1. This hearing has been done by video conferencing. 2. The Petitioner has filed the instant…

Whether the Court should insist for production of Original documents if documents are undisputed?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI RFA 297/2015 Decided On: 31.01.2018 ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Kamini Sharma and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: Prathiba M. Singh, J. Citation: MANU/DE/0438/2018 1. The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment/order dated 6th February, 2015 by which the suit…

Whether Executing court can go into the question of genuineness and validity of the Will in execution of decree?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CM (M) 49/2018, CM App. 1317/2018, CM (M) 50/2018, CM App. 1341/2018, CM (M) 67/2018 and CM App. 1713/2018 Decided On: 27.04.2020 Hari Singh Vs. Union of India Hon’ble Judges/Coram: Prathiba M. Singh, J. 1. The present petitions raise…

Contempt, Allegations and the Repeated e-mails court imposed fine for browbeating junior Advocate

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI Cont. CAS (C) 66/2020 and CM Appl. 3249/2020 Decided On: 27.01.2020 CNA Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Mansi Sharma and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram:Prathiba M. Singh, J. 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by M/s. CNA Exports (P.) Ltd….

Upon a Party whom whom onus lies to prove an issue cannot be permitted to fill lacunae in his own evidence by leading rebuttal evidence

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI CM (M) 1457/2019, CM Appls. 44339 and 44340/2019 Decided On: 10.12.2019 Hemant Kumar Singhal Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and Ors. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: Prathiba M. Singh, J. 1. The Petitioner/Defendant No. 2-Mr. Hemant Kumar Singhal (hereinafter ‘Defendant No. 2) is…

Parties should not be permitted to commence Evidence unless they file Witness list

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 22nd November, 2019 CM (M) 1656/2019 GANGA RAM ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate. (M:9716104763) versus SHEKHAR KUMAR ….. Respondent Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) CM…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation