MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Whether the court should set aside conviction if there is a compromise between convict and victim after conviction in a non-compoundable offence?

Bombay High Court Kiran Tulshiram Ingale vs Anupama P. Gaikwad And Ors. on 25 July, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 4591 Bench: D Deshpande, S Bobde JUDGMENT D.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard advocates for the petitioner and Respondent No. 1. Petitioner is the husband and…

FIR lodged on mere basis of taking revenge against wife’s maintenance petition, liable to be quashed

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 994 OF 2018 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1823 of 2017) Anupriya Pal & Others ..Appellants Versus State of U.P. & Anr. ..Respondents ORDER Leave granted. 2. This appeal is filed by…

Section 406/420 filed to Harass Quashed

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 908 OF 2009 [Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 1793 of 2008] HARMANPREET SINGH AHLUWALIA & ORS. … APPELLANTS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. … RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT S.B. SINHA, J. 1. Leave…

Offence U/s 498(A)/406/34 IPC Quash and Period of Limitation

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. CRIMINAL MISC. CASE NO. 10215 OF 2001 This is an application under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Rajani Kanta Padhi ……. Petitioner. -Versus- State of Orissa and others ……. Opp. Parties. For Petitioner : M/s. S.Pujhari, P.K.Pattnaik,B.Sahoo, J.A.Reddy…

Limitation in case of matrimonial offence

Sanapareddy Maheedhar and Another vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Sections 324/34 IPC quash with Section 482 Cr.P.C

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5154/2015 & Crl.M.A. No. 18560/2015 Date of Decision : April 1st , 2016 SANJAY BHARDWAJ … Petitioner Through: Mr.Arjun Singh Bhati, Adv. versus STATE & ORS. … Respondent Through: Mr.Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP. Mr.Vishal Sharma,…

S.482-Apex Court can quash non-compoundable offences

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4159/2015 & Crl.M.A. 14917/2015 Date of Decision : January 22nd, 2016 SMT POOJA SAXENA ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajan Chaudhary, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ….. Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Kumar…


Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


COMPARATIVE TABLES
IPC and BNS(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
CRPC and BNSS(Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Evidence Act and BSA(Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation