MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Judge of Court of Record cannot be tried for committing contempt of his own Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Contempt Petition No. 03 of 2018 Chhitij Kishore Sharma….Petitioner Versus Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh….Respondent Present: Mr. Akhilesh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J., Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, J….

Permanent alimony denied under Sec 25 HMA, No proof of cruelty.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH A.F.R. RESERVED Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. – 72 of 2004 Appellant :- Smt. Archana Sharma Respondent :- Mukesh Kumar Sharma Counsel for Appellant :- S.C. Srivastava,Manoj K Jaiswal,Satish Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- S.C. Shukla,Indrajeet…

Every child with Special need has a fundamental right to develop with dignity and equality

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL WRIT PETITION (PIL) No.87 OF 2014 Kamal Gupta ……..Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others …….Respondents Mr. Rajendra Dobhal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Devang Dobhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Pradeep Joshi, Standing Counsel for the…

Whether proceeding for divorce will be barred by res judicata if there is decree or dismissal of suit for restitution of conjugal rights?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal from Order No. 552 of 2015 Balveer Singh …………….Appellant Versus Harjeet Kaur ………. Respondent Present: Mr. G.C. Lakhchaura, Advocate for the appellant. Coram:- Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J. Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. Reserved on 16.06.2017 Decided…

No Maintenance pendente lite under HMA 24 who having independent source of Income

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal from Order No.423 of 2016 Smt. Mamta Rai …………..Appellant Versus Yogendra Kumar Rai ………. Respondent Present: Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the respondent. Coram:- Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J. Hon’ble…

Difference between Desertion and Wilful Separation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No.06 of 2013 Reserved on: 21st December , 2016 Decided on: 7th January,2017 Mohan Singh Mawri ….. Appellant Versus Haripriya …… Respondent Mr. Pooran Singh Rawati, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate,…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation