IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.115 OF 2014 Rajiv Hiranandani … Petitioner V/s. Namrata Zakaria … Respondent Ms.Edith Dey, for the Petitioner. Ms.T.F.Irani, for the Respondent. Both the parties are present. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATED : 30th July, 2014. P.C. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner herein, is challenging the order dated 3rd December, 2013, passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Bandra, Mumbai, below Exhibit – 6 in Petition No.C141 of 2012, by which the petitioner has been directed to pay Rs.50,000/, by way of adhoc interim maintenance. 3. By consent, the impugned order dated 3rd December, 2013, passed by the learned Family Court Judge, Bandra, Mumbai, below Exhibit – 6 in Petition No.C141 of 2012, is quashed and set aside. As far as second prayer of the petitioner, seeking transfer of the case is concerned, the said prayer is rejected as it is without substance and devoid of merit. 4. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the respondent has moved an application before the Family Court, seeking amendment to the main petition, being Petition No.C141 of 2012, for deletion of the reliefs sought for under the Domestic Violence Act. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that she will not oppose the amendment application, wherein the amendment is for deleting the reliefs sought for under the Domestic Violence Act. Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that the respondent be permitted to file a fresh application seeking interim maintenance under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act….