sec.304 b ipc – MyNation KnowledgeBase

498a acquital : Neighbours and Panchayatdars not examined

Posted on 23/01/2020 by MyNation 1 Comment

Andhra High Court P. Vasu And Anr. vs State Of A.P. on 2 August, 2004 Equivalent citations: I (2005) DMC 753 Bench: P Narayana JUDGMENT P.S. Narayana, J. 1. A1 and A3 in Sessions Case No. 462 of 1996 on the file of Sessions Judge,…

Mere direct of dowry, No determined direct of dowry clear in 498A and 304B

Posted on 12/10/2018 by MyNation 1 Comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1097/2012 JAGDISH & ORS…Appellants Versus STATE OF UTTARANCHAL ..Respondent J U D G M E N T R. BANUMATHI, J. JUDGEMENT This interest arises out of visualisation antiquated 29.12.2011 upheld by High Court…

Prosecution unsuccessful to entirely prove mandate of both Section 113B of Evidence Act and Section 304B, IPC

Posted on 12/10/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1081 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5450 of 2009) Durga Prasad & Anr. … Appellants Vs. The State of M.P. … Respondent J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR,…

One Month Civil Imprisonment for Default of Maintenance

Posted on 19/05/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 677 of 2018 13.03.2018 Gobbatina Venkateswara Rao.. Petitioner/petitioner Vs. State of A.P. represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and one another ……

498A Quash – General, Hearsay accusation

Posted on 15/02/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Andhra High Court Public Prosecutor, High Court Of … vs T. Anand Kumar on 3 August, 2004 Equivalent citations: 2004 (2) ALD Cri 354, I (2005) DMC 162 Bench: P Narayana JUDGMENT P.S. Narayana, J. JUDGMENT P.S. Narayana, J. 1. Heard the learned Additional Public…

RTI to CIC on 498A Statistics and Implementation details.

Posted on 16/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC/WB/A/2007/01515 dated 12.12.2007 Right to Information Act 2005 – Section 19 Appellant – Shri Kollu Durga Prasad Respondent – Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) Facts: By two RTI applications addressed to Prime Minister’s Office and Ministry of Law & Justice, both…

304-B, General, Vague and Inconsistent statements, Section 498-A set aside

Posted on 09/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1029 of 2001 PETITIONER:SUNIL BAJAJ… APPELLANT Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF M.P…. RESPONDENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/10/2001 BENCH:U.C. Banerjee ,Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J. Leave granted. The appellant has filed this appeal, aggrieved by the order dated…

Conflicting statements of Dowry in 304-b, charge removed

Posted on 09/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

Rajasthan High Court Vishwa Kumar Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 1 February, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 2096, I (2006) DMC 574, RLW 2006 (2) Raj 1123, 2006 (2) WLC 268 Bench: R Chauhan JUDGMENT R.S. Chauhan, J. 1. Within two days…

Whether offence U/S 498A of IPC can be proved on basis of dying declaration?

Posted on 03/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1774 OF 2008 Bhupendra .…..Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh …..Respondent J U D G M E N T Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The question before us is whether Bhupendra (the appellant)…

Acquitted – Urgent domestic expenses for purchasing manure cannot be termed as a demand for dowry

Posted on 02/01/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJALSTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T 1. Amit Sharma S/o Prem Prakash 2. Prem Prakash S/o Ram Narain 3. Smt.Gayatri W/o Prem Prakash…..Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan…..Respondent (S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1096/2006) S.B.CRIMINAL…

Enter your email Address

MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: sec.304 b ipc

498a acquital : Neighbours and Panchayatdars not examined

Mere direct of dowry, No determined direct of dowry clear in 498A and 304B

Prosecution unsuccessful to entirely prove mandate of both Section 113B of Evidence Act and Section 304B, IPC

One Month Civil Imprisonment for Default of Maintenance

498A Quash – General, Hearsay accusation

RTI to CIC on 498A Statistics and Implementation details.

304-B, General, Vague and Inconsistent statements, Section 498-A set aside

Conflicting statements of Dowry in 304-b, charge removed

Whether offence U/S 498A of IPC can be proved on basis of dying declaration?

Acquitted – Urgent domestic expenses for purchasing manure cannot be termed as a demand for dowry

STUDY REPORTS

Recent Comments

SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

498A victim Autobiography

MyNation Blog

News

Home Remedies N tips

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away