MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

No Record or explanation of Dowry demand, Cruelty, Acquitted in Dowry Death

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 476 OF 2005 TARSEM SINGH … APPELLANT Versus STATE OF PUNJAB … RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Appellant was prosecuted for committing murder of his mom Amriko. They were married in a year 1983. Appellant was…

Mere direct of dowry, No determined direct of dowry clear in 498A and 304B

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1097/2012 JAGDISH & ORS…Appellants Versus STATE OF UTTARANCHAL ..Respondent J U D G M E N T R. BANUMATHI, J. JUDGEMENT This interest arises out of visualisation antiquated 29.12.2011 upheld by High Court…

Prosecution unsuccessful to entirely prove mandate of both Section 113B of Evidence Act and Section 304B, IPC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1081 OF 2010 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5450 of 2009) Durga Prasad & Anr. … Appellants Vs. The State of M.P. … Respondent J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS KABIR,…

498A Conviction set aside. Courts have to be clever to see either a accusations are loyal or directed during fake implication

Orissa High Court Babaji Charan Barik vs State on 8 October, 1993 Equivalent citations: 1994 we OLR 66 Author: A Pasayat Bench: A Pasayat, D Patnaik JUDGMENT A. Pasayat, J. 1. Was a emptied dowry explain of a appellant Babaji Charan Barik (hereinafter referred to…

One Month Civil Imprisonment for Default of Maintenance

In the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 677 of 2018 13.03.2018 Gobbatina Venkateswara Rao.. Petitioner/petitioner Vs. State of A.P. represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad and one another ……

498A Quash – General, Hearsay accusation

Andhra High Court Public Prosecutor, High Court Of … vs T. Anand Kumar on 3 August, 2004 Equivalent citations: 2004 (2) ALD Cri 354, I (2005) DMC 162 Bench: P Narayana JUDGMENT P.S. Narayana, J. JUDGMENT P.S. Narayana, J. 1. Heard the learned Additional Public…

304-B, General, Vague and Inconsistent statements, Section 498-A  set aside

Supreme Court of India CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 1029 of 2001 PETITIONER:SUNIL BAJAJ… APPELLANT Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF M.P…. RESPONDENT DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/10/2001 BENCH:U.C. Banerjee ,Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT: SHIVARAJ V. PATIL J. Leave granted. The appellant has filed this appeal, aggrieved by the order dated…

Conflicting statements of Dowry in 304-b, charge removed

Rajasthan High Court Vishwa Kumar Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr. on 1 February, 2006 Equivalent citations: 2006 CriLJ 2096, I (2006) DMC 574, RLW 2006 (2) Raj 1123, 2006 (2) WLC 268 Bench: R Chauhan JUDGMENT R.S. Chauhan, J. 1. Within two days…

Whether offence U/S 498A of IPC can be proved on basis of dying declaration?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1774 OF 2008 Bhupendra .…..Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh …..Respondent J U D G M E N T Madan B. Lokur, J. 1. The question before us is whether Bhupendra (the appellant)…

Acquitted – Urgent domestic expenses for purchasing manure cannot be termed as a demand for dowry

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJALSTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR J U D G M E N T 1. Amit Sharma S/o Prem Prakash 2. Prem Prakash S/o Ram Narain 3. Smt.Gayatri W/o Prem Prakash…..Appellants Versus State of Rajasthan…..Respondent (S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1096/2006) S.B.CRIMINAL…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


COMPARATIVE TABLES
IPC and BNS(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
CRPC and BNSS(Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023)
Evidence Act and BSA(Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)
All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation