MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

What are limitation on exercise or power under Order 41, Rule 33 of CPC?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal No. 1745-1753 of 2004 Decided On: 15.09.2010 Pralhad and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. Hon’ble Judges/Coram: G.S. Singhvi and A.K. Ganguly, JJ. Citation:2010) 10 SCC 458 1. The relevant facts common in these appeals are…

False 498A, Divorce over RCR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 20, 2016 Judgment Delivered on: October 25, 2016 MAT.APP.(F.C.) 123/2014 PUSHKAR GUPTA ….. Appellant Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Adv.with appellant in person versus NARENDER KUMAR GUPTA ….. Respondent Represented by: Mr.Naveen Kumar…

CopyRight @ MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation