Section 34 IPC – Page 2 – MyNation KnowledgeBase

Whether judge should record detailed reasons for Framing of charge in session trial?

Posted on 08/12/201908/12/2019 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1820 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.6964 of 2019) BHAWNA BAI …Appellant VERSUS GHANSHYAM AND OTHERS …Respondents JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal arises out of the impugned judgment…

Wife Expected To Be With Husband’s Family, Cannot Force husband to stay away from his family without reason

Posted on 24/05/2019 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No.139 of 2017 Sheenu Mahendru ….. Appellant Versus Sangeeta @ Soniya ….Respondent Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Syed Kashif Jafri, Advocate for the respondent. Reserved on: May 10, 2019 Date of Pronouncement:…

When unnatural death of married woman would not amount to Dowry death?

Posted on 06/01/2019 by MyNation Leave a comment

In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi (Before R.K Gauba, J.) Shiv Ram & Ors. v. State of Delhi Citation: 2018 SCC OnLine Del 13127 Crl. A. 496/2002 Decided on December 7, 2018 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.K Gauba,…

Benefit of Doubt, Acquitted in Sections 498A/Section 302 IPC

Posted on 10/10/2018 by MyNation 1 Comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 919 OF 2013 JOSE @ PAPPACHAN …APPELLANT VERSUS THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KOYILANDY ANOTHER …RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T AMITAVA ROY, J. The appellant stands sequentially convicted by the both…

Challenging the legality of the order – Name Removal

Posted on 03/08/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CASE NO.:Appeal (crl.) 420 of 2006 PETITIONER:Minu Kumari and Anr. RESPONDENT:The State of Bihar and Ors. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/04/2006 BENCH:ARIJIT PASAYAT S.H. KAPADIA JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T (Arising out of (SLP (Crl.) No. 4607 of…

Criminal case compounded as the offence alleged was not ‘stricto sensu’ against the State

Posted on 14/07/201814/07/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 173 of 2009. Date of decision: 15th May, 2018. Sunit Singh & anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of H.P. ……Respondent Coram :The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. For the Petitioners : Mr….

Anticipatory bail cannot be denied on sole grounds that a serious charge is leveled against accused

Posted on 05/06/2018 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C.1829/2017 Judgement reserved on:3rd November,2017 Judgement pronounced on: 20th November,2017 SHIVALI SHARMA ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. Shalinder Dhaiya, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR …. Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh kumar, APP with…

Vague allegations of Dowry demand, 304B and 498a quash

Posted on 08/12/2017 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE COURT OF SHRI AJAY KUMAR KUHAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE 02 : SE : SAKET COURT : ND IN RE: ID No. DLSE010001482013 SC No. 1388/16 FIR No.551/13 PS Govindpuri State Versus (1) Mithun S/o Shri Nokhai (2) Nokhai S/o Shri Tirath Nishad (3) Sushila Devi W/o Shri Nokhai All R/o RZ3121, Gali No. 35,Tughlakabad Extension,New Delhi. Date of Institution : 27.11.2013 Date of arguments : 08.11.2017 Date of judgment : 27.11.2017 JUDGMENT 1. The accused have been put to trial for the offences u/s 498 A IPC read with section 34 IPC; 302 IPC read with 34 IPC, 304B IPC read with 34 IPC and section 406 IPC read with section 34 IPC. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that on 04.08.2013, DD No. 6A was noted in the…

8 months unexplained delay in lodging complaint, 498a dismissed.

Posted on 23/11/2017 by MyNation 2 Comments

Delhi High Court Jagdish Chand vs The State And Ors. on 26 August, 1994 Equivalent citations: 1995 CriLJ 2253, 1994 (31) DRJ 78 Bench: D Bhandari JUDGMENT Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) This criminal revision has been filed against the order dated 25th October, 1990. By…

Whether bail granted on irrelevant material can be cancelled?

Posted on 10/06/2017 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : MAY 31, 2017. CRL.M.C. 844/2017 CRL.M.A.No.3554/17 ROHIT BANSAL Vs STATE ANR. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG 1. The instant petition under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner-Rohit…

Enter your email Address

MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: Section 34 IPC

Whether judge should record detailed reasons for Framing of charge in session trial?

Wife Expected To Be With Husband’s Family, Cannot Force husband to stay away from his family without reason

When unnatural death of married woman would not amount to Dowry death?

Benefit of Doubt, Acquitted in Sections 498A/Section 302 IPC

Challenging the legality of the order – Name Removal

Criminal case compounded as the offence alleged was not ‘stricto sensu’ against the State

Anticipatory bail cannot be denied on sole grounds that a serious charge is leveled against accused

Vague allegations of Dowry demand, 304B and 498a quash

8 months unexplained delay in lodging complaint, 498a dismissed.

Whether bail granted on irrelevant material can be cancelled?

STUDY REPORTS

Recent Comments

SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

498A victim Autobiography

MyNation Blog

News

Home Remedies N tips

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away