MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Judge of Court of Record cannot be tried for committing contempt of his own Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Contempt Petition No. 03 of 2018 Chhitij Kishore Sharma….Petitioner Versus Mr. Justice Lok Pal Singh….Respondent Present: Mr. Akhilesh Kalra, Advocate for the petitioner. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J., Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, J….

Wife Expected To Be With Husband’s Family, Cannot Force husband to stay away from his family without reason

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No.139 of 2017 Sheenu Mahendru ….. Appellant Versus Sangeeta @ Soniya ….Respondent Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Syed Kashif Jafri, Advocate for the respondent. Reserved on: May 10, 2019 Date of Pronouncement:…

Non-aggrieved party has no reason to question the acts wherein he did not suffer as a consequence thereof

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3358 of 2018 M/s Tanuja Parwati Transport & Forwarding Agency……….Petitioner Versus Indian Oil Corporation Limited and another …Respondents Present:- Mr. Lalit Belwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. V.K. Kohli, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr….

No prejudice as to remuneration when nature of work same; equal pay for equal work

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1126 of 2017 Dr. Ravi Saini & another ………….Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …….Respondents Present:- Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Yogesh Pandey, Additional C.S.C. for the State/respondent Nos. 1…

A mother’s writ of habeas corpus denied as custody of child with the father is not illegal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Habeas Corpus Petition No. 23 of 2018 Akanksha Budhiraja ….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others….Respondents Present: Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the State/respondent nos. 1, 2, 3 & 6….

Difference between Desertion and Wilful Separation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL First Appeal No.06 of 2013 Reserved on: 21st December , 2016 Decided on: 7th January,2017 Mohan Singh Mawri ….. Appellant Versus Haripriya …… Respondent Mr. Pooran Singh Rawati, Advocate for the appellant. Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate,…

Information about Salary of wife with RTI (Right to information Act)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2489 of 2016 Jasmeet Kaur. Vs State of Uttarakhand others. Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Citation: AIR 2017 UTTAR 1 1. The case of the petitioner before this Court is that her husband (respondent…

Custody of female child to the father is declined.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL FIRST APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2010 Popendra Datt Painuly, S/o Sri Purshottam Datt Painuly, R/o Tehri Visthapit Basti, Village Pathri, Near Pathri Railway Station, Tehsil and District Haridwar. .Appellant. Versus 1. Smt. Sunita, D/o Sri Shyam Lal…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 MyNation KnowledgeBase
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation