MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Section 145, Indian Evidence Act does not apply to prove “omissions” in witness statements during criminal trial

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   Present: The Hon’ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi & The Hon’ble Justice Suvra Ghosh CRA 709 of 2014 Md. Irfan & Ors.-vs-The State of West Bengal With CRA 719 of 2014 Md. Akran @ Gabbar @ Gubbar…

SAMPLE DP3 – Use Daughter FIR against Parents

Date: 20/01/2012 To: Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police address……. From Your Name and Address Subject: Reporting cognizable offence under CrPc / u/s 3 of DP Act. Sir, This is in reply to the your RTI reply [GNL1/411/RTI/oo g/11] received by me…

Contradiction of Statement : SC sets free accused in 498A

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.184 of 2006 Subhash …………..Appellant Vs. State of Haryana ……..Respondent JUDGMENT HARJIT SINGH BEDI,J. This appeal arises out of the following facts : 1. The deceased Anuradha, and the appellant Subhash, a resident of…

Dowry Death and Witness Statement

N Santosh Hegde & B P Singh. SANTOSH HEGDE, J. Being aggrieved by the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, the appellant has preferred this appeal. By the said judgment said High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellant…

CopyRight @ MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation