MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Interim Maintenance denied in DV case when wife was working earlier

IN THE COURT OF MS. POOJA TALWAR METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE (MAHILA COURT – SOUTH EAST DISTRICT) SAKET COURTS COMPLEX. NEW DELHI CCINOI 352/3 In the matter of: – DAMAN REET KAUR….. .. . …. .. …… COMPLAI NANT VS. INDERMEET SINGH JUNEJA…….. ……. … RESPONDENT DATE…

Working Women, No Alimony Pendentilite

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) 8 April, 2009 Author: Tapas Kumar Giri C.O. No.2362 of 2007 Kalyan Bose Versus Sadhana Bose (Raha) Mr. U.S. Chattopadhyay …For the petitioner Mr. Sanat Chowdhuri …For the opposite party This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India…

Maintenance case, striking off defence

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 06.01.2011 Judgment delivered on: 08.04.2011 MAT.APP.52/2009 Smt.Kavita ……Appellant Through: Mr.S.K.Bhalla, Adv. Vs. Shri Rakesh Raman ……Respondent. Through: Mr.V. K. Khurana, Adv. CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR 1. Whether the Reporters of local papers…

Maintenance – How to handle.

The are many types of maintenance cases in India:   Section 125 of the CrPC: Meant to provide no-fault maintenance to wife from husband. Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA): Though gender neutral, is largely used by women to extract maintenance from…

No maintenance – Working Women

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1789-1790 OF 2009 (Arising out of SLP(C) NOS. 24589-24590 of 2007) Anu Kaul …….. Appellant Versus Rajeev Kaul ……..Respondent ORDER Leave granted. 2) In the appeal filed by the respondent-husband before the High Court…

Husband is not liable to pay litigation expenses to the wife

Refer : >> http://mynation.net/docs/1534-2006/

Maintenance reduce – Working Women

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 28.7.2008 Date of Order: 5.9.2008 CM(M) No. 1534/2006 Parnab Kumar Chakarborthy … Petitioner Through: Mr. (Dr.) J.C.Vashist, Advocate Versus Ruma Chakarborthy … Respondents Through: Ms. Manali Singhal, Advocate JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA 1….

No Maintenance u/s125Crpc for working Women

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL REVISION No. 88 of 2002 Vikas Jain . . Revisionist Versus Smt. Deepali @ Ayushi Jain Respondent October 25, 2010 Mr. Arvind Vashistha, Advocate for the revisionist. Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lok…

Vishakha and Ors. vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors

PETITIONER: VISHAKA & ORS. Vs. RESPONDENT:STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. (AIR 1997 SUPREME COURT 3011) DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/08/1997 BENCH: CJI, SUJATA V. MANOHAR, B. N. KIRPAL ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T Verma, CJI: This Writ Petition has been…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh