{"id":5762,"date":"2017-07-27T11:57:47","date_gmt":"2017-07-27T06:27:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/?p=5762"},"modified":"2017-07-27T11:57:47","modified_gmt":"2017-07-27T06:27:47","slug":"1902-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/1902-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"Burden of proof is on accused to prove the voluntary consent of the deceased"},"content":{"rendered":"

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<\/strong><\/p>\n

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION<\/p>\n

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. \u00a01902 \u00a0 \u00a0OF 2014
\n(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1800 of 2014)<\/p>\n

NARENDRA \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 ….Appellant<\/p>\n

Versus<\/p>\n

STATE OF RAJASTHAN \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 … Respondent<\/p>\n

Dated;September 2, \u00a02014<\/p>\n

R. BANUMATHI, J.<\/p>\n

Delay condoned. \u00a0Leave granted.<\/p>\n

2. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0This appeal \u00a0is directed against the \u00a0judgment \u00a0dated \u00a09.11.2011 passed by the Jodhpur Bench of Rajasthan High Court in D.B. Crl. Appeal \u00a0No. 950\/2004 by which the High Court has confirmed conviction of the \u00a0 appellant under Sections 302 and 309 IPC and the \u00a0sentence \u00a0imposed upon him.<\/p>\n

3. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Briefly stated, the case \u00a0of \u00a0the \u00a0prosecution \u00a0is \u00a0that \u00a0Nathi, sister of PW-3 Naresh Salvi, got married to Magan Salvi. \u00a0 About \u00a0two \u00a0years prior to the incident, due to differences with her husband, Nathi \u00a0left \u00a0her matrimonial house and she was residing at her parents\u2019 house, \u00a0Mauza \u00a0Basti, District Udaipur. \u00a0While staying at her parents\u2019 house, Mauza \u00a0Basti, \u00a0Nathi developed intimacy with Narendra- the accused. \u00a0About three months prior \u00a0to the incident, Nathi and the accused \u00a0eloped \u00a0and \u00a0returned \u00a0to \u00a0the \u00a0village after 10-15 days. \u00a0On 19.03.2003, \u00a0the \u00a0parents \u00a0of \u00a0the \u00a0deceased \u00a0and \u00a0the complainant went \u00a0for \u00a0work. \u00a0 \u00a0PW-3 \u00a0was \u00a0also \u00a0not \u00a0at \u00a0home \u00a0and \u00a0he \u00a0was participating in some events pertaining to Holi festival and Nathi \u00a0was \u00a0all alone at home. \u00a0 At about 2.30 p.m., on returning home, PW-3 found the \u00a0main gate closed, and despite calling, the \u00a0gate \u00a0was \u00a0not \u00a0opened \u00a0from \u00a0inside. Thereafter PW-3 entered into the interior open floor of \u00a0the \u00a0house \u00a0through the outer wall, wherefrom he saw Nathi and \u00a0Narendra \u00a0 standing \u00a0in \u00a0a \u00a0room with closed door. \u00a0 From the peep-hole of the door, \u00a0PW-3 \u00a0saw \u00a0the \u00a0accused with \u00a0a sword in his hand and the accused \u00a0inflicted \u00a0 sword \u00a0blows \u00a0on \u00a0the deceased and caused stab injuries on the chest and the abdomen. \u00a0On \u00a0hearing the alarm raised by PW-3, neighbours Kalu Lal and \u00a0Shankar \u00a0Lal \u00a0and \u00a0others came to the place of occurrence and the door of the room was opened. \u00a0 Nathi was found on the floor \u00a0with stab injuries bleeding \u00a0all \u00a0over \u00a0and \u00a0accused was also found \u00a0having stab \u00a0wounds in his abdomen.<\/p>\n

4. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0On oral information given by PW 1- Shankar Lal, Sarpanch \u00a0Kishan Singh had telephoned to police and FIR was registered against \u00a0the \u00a0accused. PW 7 – Dr. M.L. Purbia conducted autopsy on the body of the \u00a0deceased \u00a0Nathi and opined that the cause of death was due to shock and \u00a0excessive \u00a0bleeding in the chest. PW-7 examined the \u00a0injuries \u00a0on \u00a0the \u00a0person \u00a0of \u00a0accused \u00a0and issued Exhibit P-12 Injury Certificate. \u00a0After completion \u00a0of \u00a0investigation the accused was challaned for the offences \u00a0punishable \u00a0under \u00a0Sections \u00a0302 and 309 IPC.<\/p>\n

5. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0To bring home the guilt of \u00a0the \u00a0accused, \u00a0prosecution \u00a0examined PWs -1 to 17 and exhibited documents and material objects. \u00a0The accused \u00a0was questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C about \u00a0the \u00a0incriminating \u00a0evidence \u00a0and circumstances. \u00a0The accused stated that \u00a0he \u00a0is \u00a0innocent \u00a0and \u00a0he \u00a0had \u00a0not committed the offence. \u00a0The accused further stated that \u00a0himself \u00a0and \u00a0Nathi were in love which was not accepted by the villagers and \u00a0hence \u00a0they \u00a0tried to commit suicide in which he survived and the deceased Nathi died.<\/p>\n

6. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0The trial court, on consideration \u00a0of \u00a0evidence, \u00a0convicted \u00a0the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentenced him \u00a0to \u00a0undergo \u00a0imprisonment for life and imposed a fine of Rs.2,000\/-, in default of payment of fine \u00a0to further undergo three months simple \u00a0imprisonment. \u00a0 The \u00a0trial \u00a0court \u00a0also convicted the appellant under Section 309 IPC and sentenced him \u00a0to \u00a0undergo simple imprisonment for six months and a fine of Rs.500\/- \u00a0was \u00a0imposed \u00a0and both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. \u00a0On \u00a0appeal, \u00a0the \u00a0High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence imposed on the \u00a0appellant \u00a0under Sections 302 and 309 IPC. \u00a0Being \u00a0aggrieved, \u00a0the \u00a0appellant \u00a0has \u00a0preferred this appeal.<\/p>\n

7. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0The learned counsel for the appellant contended that as per \u00a0the evidence of PW 3, the appellant and the deceased Nathi were \u00a0in \u00a0the \u00a0closed room and PW 3 could not have viewed the occurrence inside the room \u00a0and \u00a0the site sketch does not make a mention about the \u00a0peep-hole \u00a0of \u00a0the \u00a0door \u00a0and while so, the courts erred in placing reliance upon the evidence of PW-3 \u00a0to convict the accused. \u00a0It was contended that the \u00a0accused \u00a0and \u00a0the \u00a0deceased were in deep love and both belonged to the \u00a0same \u00a0caste \u00a0and \u00a0the \u00a0villagers were not ready to accept the relationship of the accused and \u00a0deceased \u00a0and, therefore, both of them tried to commit suicide and only on the \u00a0consent \u00a0of the deceased, the \u00a0accused \u00a0inflicted \u00a0injuries \u00a0on \u00a0the \u00a0deceased \u00a0and \u00a0the offence committed by the accused attracts Exception 5 \u00a0of \u00a0Section \u00a0300 \u00a0IPC punishable under Section 304 Part I IPC.<\/p>\n

8. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0The learned counsel for the State took us through \u00a0the \u00a0evidence of PW 3 and submitted that \u00a0PW \u00a03 \u00a0being \u00a0reliable \u00a0witness, \u00a0based \u00a0on \u00a0his evidence, the \u00a0courts \u00a0below \u00a0rightly \u00a0held \u00a0the \u00a0appellant \u00a0guilty \u00a0of \u00a0the offence. \u00a0The learned counsel contended that the stab injuries inflicted \u00a0in the chest and the abdomen of the deceased \u00a0clearly \u00a0show \u00a0that \u00a0the \u00a0accused intentionally inflicted the injuries to cause death of the deceased and \u00a0the courts rightly disbelieved the defence version and convicted the appellant.<\/p>\n

9. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0We have carefully considered \u00a0the \u00a0submissions \u00a0of \u00a0the \u00a0learned counsel appearing for the parties. \u00a0The explanation of the \u00a0accused \u00a0whether he acted in furtherance of the suicide pact and whether the \u00a0homicide \u00a0falls under Exception 5 of Section 300 IPC \u00a0and \u00a0whether \u00a0the \u00a0conviction \u00a0of \u00a0the appellant is to be modified under Section 304 Part I IPC \u00a0are \u00a0 the \u00a0 points falling \u00a0for \u00a0our consideration.<\/p>\n

10. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The essential facts are not in \u00a0dispute. \u00a0 That \u00a0deceased \u00a0Nathi after leaving \u00a0her \u00a0matrimonial \u00a0house, \u00a0while \u00a0she \u00a0was \u00a0residing \u00a0 at \u00a0her maternal \u00a0home, she has developed love and \u00a0intense \u00a0relationship \u00a0with \u00a0the accused Narendra. \u00a0There is adequate evidence which clearly \u00a0show \u00a0the \u00a0love affair between the deceased and the accused. \u00a0 Since the \u00a0deceased \u00a0and \u00a0the accused were of the same gotra, their relationship was not accepted \u00a0by \u00a0the villagers. \u00a0 PW-3 admits that Nathi and accused \u00a0 were \u00a0in \u00a0love \u00a0 and \u00a0that Nathi \u00a0and the accused eloped and lived together for about 10-15 \u00a0days. \u00a0 \u00a0A panchayat was convened after Nathi returned home. \u00a0 In \u00a0his \u00a0evidence \u00a0PW \u00a03 stated that Nathi \u00a0having left \u00a0her \u00a0previous husband, wanted to \u00a0marry \u00a0the accused; but to \u00a0Gotra \u00a0of \u00a0both being \u00a0one \u00a0 the \u00a0marriage \u00a0could \u00a0not \u00a0 be held. \u00a0As their desire of marriage \u00a0was \u00a0 not \u00a0accepted \u00a0by \u00a0the \u00a0villagers, perhaps accused and the deceased \u00a0were dejected.<\/p>\n

11. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In the incident, the accused \u00a0had \u00a0inflicted \u00a0injuries \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0with the sword on the chest and the \u00a0abdomen \u00a0and \u00a0from \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Ex.P.13-post \u00a0mortem report, it is seen that the deceased had sustained the following injuries:<\/p>\n

\u201cExternal Injuries:
\n(1) \u00a0 Stab wound with one \u00a0end (edge) is sharp and other is rounded 4.5 \u00a0cm.
\nX 2cm. X intra thorax deep on left breast \u00a0in \u00a05 \u00a0the \u00a0inter \u00a0coastal \u00a0space
\ngoing obliquely postero medially piercing right ventricle of heart of apex.
\n(2) \u00a0 Stab wound 4.5 x 2cm. x intra abdominal Horizontal \u2013 \u00a0on \u00a0Supra \u00a0pubic
\nregion 6cm. below umbilicus in mid low \u00a0piercing \u00a0peritoneum \u00a0and \u00a0intestine
\none and is sharp.
\n(3) \u00a0 Stab wound 4.5 cm x 2cm x abdominal deep on right side \u00a0abdomen \u00a06 \u00a0cm
\nlateral to umbilicus piece of intestine come out.
\n(4) \u00a0 Incised wound 6cm x 3cm x bone deep on middle \u00a01\/3 \u00a0of \u00a0left \u00a0forearm,
\nmuscles and blood vessels cut down.
\n(5) \u00a0 Incised wound 3.5cm x 2cm \u00a0x \u00a0muscles \u00a0deep \u00a0x \u00a03cm \u00a0proximal \u00a0to \u00a04th
\ninjury.
\n(6) \u00a0 Incised wound 2.5cm x 0.2cm x skin deep right elbow.
\nBruise 5 cm. x 4cm on right hand posteriorly.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

PW-7 Dr. M.L. Purbia opined that the death was due to shock and \u00a0haemorrhage and injury No.1 was sufficient to cause the death.<\/p>\n

12. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The accused also had the following stab injuries.<\/p>\n

\u201c1. \u00a0 Stab wound- 2cm x 1cm. \u00a0x \u00a0intra \u00a0abdominal \u00a0deep- \u00a0near \u00a0umbilicus reserved sharp.
\n2. \u00a0 \u00a0Stab wound- 1.5cm x 1 cm x deep intra abdominal- \u00a0on \u00a0umbilicus \u00a01 \u00a0cm away from injury No.1- reverse sharp.
\n3. \u00a0 \u00a0Stab wound- 2 cm. x 1 cm x intra abdominal \u2013 \u00a0near \u00a0umbilicus \u00a01.5 \u00a0cm below injury No.2 -reverse sharp.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The accused self inflicted the above injuries and tried to \u00a0commit \u00a0suicide.<\/p>\n

13. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The trial court and the High Court recorded concurrent \u00a0findings that the accused caused the death of Nathi and he also attempted \u00a0to \u00a0commit suicide and the \u00a0said \u00a0findings \u00a0are \u00a0unassailable. \u00a0 While \u00a0explaining \u00a0the circumstances in which he caused the death of the deceased, \u00a0the \u00a0 appellant stated that he and deceased, Nathi were in love \u00a0and \u00a0they \u00a0also \u00a0solemnized their marriage and since the appellant and deceased \u00a0belonged \u00a0to the \u00a0 same sub-caste, \u00a0the \u00a0villagers \u00a0had \u00a0objections \u00a0for \u00a0their \u00a0 relationship \u00a0 and therefore both himself and Nathi tried to \u00a0commit \u00a0suicide. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0defence version is that \u00a0acting on \u00a0the \u00a0consent \u00a0of \u00a0 Nathi, \u00a0 appellant \u00a0inflicted sword injuries on Nathi and Nathi died \u00a0but \u00a0before \u00a0however \u00a0the \u00a0appellant could kill himself, there was intervention and therefore \u00a0he could not \u00a0kill himself and the act of the accused \u00a0causing \u00a0death \u00a0of \u00a0 Nathi \u00a0falls \u00a0under Exception 5 of Section 300 IPC punishable under \u00a0Section \u00a0304 \u00a0Part \u00a0I \u00a0IPC. Reliance \u00a0is \u00a0placed \u00a0upon \u00a0the \u00a0circumstance \u00a0that \u00a0the \u00a0accused \u00a0had \u00a0also sustained stab injuries.<\/p>\n

14. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The High Court disbelieved the defence version \u00a0by \u00a0saying \u00a0that to bring \u00a0the accused \u00a0within the four corners of \u00a0Exception \u00a05 \u00a0of \u00a0Section 300 IPC, there must be cogent evidence \u00a0to show that the deceased had \u00a0given such consent and there is no material \u00a0on record to establish such free \u00a0and voluntary consent of the deceased \u00a0for \u00a0her \u00a0death. \u00a0 The \u00a0High \u00a0Court \u00a0also observed \u00a0that \u00a0there \u00a0was \u00a0no \u00a0evidence \u00a0to \u00a0show \u00a0that \u00a0the \u00a0deceased \u00a0was experiencing intolerable mental sufferings with no prospect of \u00a0 improvement and that she took the decision \u00a0that death was the only resort.<\/p>\n

15. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Under Exception 5 to Section 300 IPC \u201cculpable homicide \u00a0is \u00a0not murder when \u00a0the person \u00a0whose \u00a0death \u00a0is caused, \u00a0being above \u00a0the \u00a0age \u00a0of 18 years, suffers death or takes the risk of death \u00a0with his \u00a0own \u00a0consent.\u201d To attract Exception 5 to Section 300 IPC, there must \u00a0have \u00a0been \u00a0free \u00a0and voluntary consent of the deceased person. \u00a0 The onus of proving \u00a0consent \u00a0of the deceased person is on the accused. \u00a0 Exception \u00a05 \u00a0of \u00a0Section \u00a0300 \u00a0IPC must receive a strict and not a liberal \u00a0interpretation. \u00a0 In \u00a0applying \u00a0the said Exception, \u00a0the act alleged to be consented to or \u00a0authorized \u00a0 by \u00a0the victim \u00a0must be considered by a close scrutiny. The court must in each \u00a0case consider the evidence and the surrounding \u00a0circumstances \u00a0while \u00a0considering the question of consent.<\/p>\n

16. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0In \u00a0the \u00a0present \u00a0case, \u00a0in \u00a0our \u00a0view, \u00a0there \u00a0are \u00a0formidable circumstances discernible from the evidence \u00a0which \u00a0probablise \u00a0the \u00a0defence version which are as under:
\n(a) \u00a0 Deceased \u00a0Nathi \u00a0 and \u00a0the \u00a0accused \u00a0 were \u00a0in \u00a0love \u00a0and \u00a0they \u00a0 were intending to get married. \u00a0Since they belonged \u00a0to \u00a0the \u00a0same \u00a0gotra, \u00a0their relationship was not accepted by the villagers \u00a0and \u00a0they \u00a0objected \u00a0to \u00a0the same;
\n(b) \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 About \u00a0three months prior to the \u00a0incident, \u00a0Nathi \u00a0and \u00a0accused left the village and lived together \u00a0for about \u00a010-15 \u00a0days \u00a0and \u00a0thereafter Nathi returned \u00a0to her matrimonial house;
\n(c) \u00a0 On 19.3.2003, the parents of the deceased went for work and PW-3 \u00a0 was also \u00a0engaged in some events pertaining \u00a0to \u00a0Holi \u00a0festival \u00a0and \u00a0Nathi \u00a0was alone in the house;
\n(d) \u00a0 When the accused came to the house \u00a0 of \u00a0the \u00a0deceased, \u00a0he \u00a0 was \u00a0not armed; he had taken the sword from inside the room of the house;
\n(e) \u00a0 PW-3, nowhere stated that at the time of \u00a0 the \u00a0incident \u00a0 his \u00a0sister quarrelled with the \u00a0accused. \u00a0 When \u00a0the \u00a0accused \u00a0inflicted \u00a0sword \u00a0blows, deceased Nathi had not raised any alarm nor shouted for help;
\n(f) \u00a0 the \u00a0accused was also having the stab injuries on his \u00a0person.<\/p>\n

17. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In the present case, the accused has taken the defence \u00a0plea \u00a0of suicide \u00a0pact even \u00a0in \u00a0the \u00a0trial \u00a0court \u00a0while \u00a0 being \u00a0 questioned \u00a0under Section 313 Cr.P.C. \u00a0 The defence \u00a0version \u00a0is \u00a0probabilized \u00a0by \u00a0the \u00a0above facts and circumstances \u00a0of \u00a0the \u00a0case. \u00a0 The \u00a0death \u00a0of \u00a0deceased \u00a0was \u00a0not premeditated and the act of the accused \u00a0causing \u00a0death \u00a0of \u00a0Nathi, \u00a0in \u00a0our view, \u00a0appears to be in furtherance of the \u00a0understanding \u00a0between \u00a0them \u00a0to commit suicide and the consent of the deceased and the act \u00a0of \u00a0the \u00a0accused falls \u00a0under \u00a0Exception \u00a05 \u00a0of \u00a0Section \u00a0300 \u00a0IPC. \u00a0 \u00a0 Since \u00a0 the \u00a0 accused intentionally caused \u00a0the \u00a0death; \u00a0the \u00a0appellant \u00a0is \u00a0found \u00a0guilty \u00a0 under Section 304 Part I IPC. \u00a0The appellant is stated to be in custody \u00a0for \u00a0more than 10 years.<\/p>\n

18. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In the light of the foregoing discussion, the conviction of \u00a0the appellant \u00a0under \u00a0Section \u00a0302 \u00a0IPC \u00a0is \u00a0modified \u00a0and \u00a0 \u00a0the \u00a0appellant \u00a0is convicted \u00a0under \u00a0Section \u00a0304 \u00a0Part \u00a0I \u00a0IPC \u00a0and \u00a0 sentenced \u00a0 to \u00a0 undergo imprisonment \u00a0for the period already undergone \u00a0by him \u00a0and \u00a0the \u00a0appeal \u00a0is allowed in part. \u00a0 The \u00a0sentence \u00a0of \u00a0imprisonment \u00a0 for \u00a0 conviction \u00a0under Section \u00a0309 IPC is ordered to run concurrently. \u00a0The appellant is in \u00a0jail, and he be \u00a0released forthwith if not required in any other case.<\/p>\n

(T.S. Thakur)
\n(R. Banumathi)<\/p>\n

New Delhi;
\nSeptember 2, \u00a02014<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. \u00a01902 \u00a0 \u00a0OF 2014 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1800 of 2014)…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1091,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_customify_content_layout":"","_customify_sidebar":"","_customify_page_header_display":"","_customify_disable_header":"","_customify_disable_header_top":"","_customify_disable_header_main":"","_customify_disable_header_bottom":"","_customify_disable_page_title":"","_customify_disable_content_vertical_padding":"","_customify_disable_footer_top":"","_customify_disable_footer_main":"","_customify_disable_footer_bottom":"","_customify_breadcrumb_display":"","_customify_header_transparent_display":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[23547,25143,45108,52756,4552,53573,53576,14886,53575],"class_list":["post-5762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgments","tag-burden-of-proof","tag-consent","tag-r-banumathi","tag-section-300-ipc","tag-section-302-ipc","tag-section-304-ipc","tag-sections-309-ipc","tag-t-s-thakur","tag-voluntary-consent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1091"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}