{"id":8698,"date":"2018-06-30T20:42:31","date_gmt":"2018-06-30T15:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/?p=8698"},"modified":"2018-06-30T20:42:31","modified_gmt":"2018-06-30T15:12:31","slug":"4618-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/4618-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"General omnibus allegations are not enough to make a person liable under Section 498A IPC"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>CLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENT<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/mynation.net\/judgments\/?p=15390\">http:\/\/mynation.net\/judgments\/?p=15390<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CLICK HERE FOR JUDGMENT http:\/\/mynation.net\/judgments\/?p=15390<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1091,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_customify_content_layout":"","_customify_sidebar":"","_customify_page_header_display":"","_customify_disable_header":"","_customify_disable_header_top":"","_customify_disable_header_main":"","_customify_disable_header_bottom":"","_customify_disable_page_title":"","_customify_disable_content_vertical_padding":"","_customify_disable_footer_top":"","_customify_disable_footer_main":"","_customify_disable_footer_bottom":"","_customify_breadcrumb_display":"","_customify_header_transparent_display":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[65],"tags":[2186,57085,50412,57083,57088,57084,548,24287,49,3017,52,48,57074,50408,57087,57086,50413,57089,50406,57090,57081,50409,119,50415,57091,4434,4435,14326,13814,1689,57092,57093,3813,57082],"class_list":["post-8698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgments","tag-498a-advice","tag-498a-citation","tag-498a-judgment","tag-bail-judgment","tag-child-custody-judgment","tag-criminal-case-judgment","tag-custody","tag-custody-judgment","tag-divorce","tag-divorce-judgment","tag-domestic-violence","tag-dowry","tag-dowry-law-misuseipc-498a-by-indian-women-men-victims-of-498a","tag-dowry-system","tag-dv-act-citation","tag-dv-act-judgment","tag-dva-judgment","tag-false-case-judgment","tag-free-498a-advice","tag-indian-supreme-court-judgment","tag-ipc-498a-judgment","tag-land-mark-judgments-on-498a-ipc","tag-maintenance","tag-no-maintenance-judgment","tag-sec-498a-of-ipc","tag-sec-498a","tag-sec-498a-ipc","tag-section-482-crpc","tag-section-498a-of-ipc","tag-section-498a","tag-section-498a-anticipatory-bail","tag-section-498a-india","tag-section-498a-ipc","tag-section-498a-judgment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1091"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8698"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8698\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mynation.net\/docs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}