SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

2018) vs In Re: Manuja Bibi & Anr on 13 September, 2019



Sl. No.127
C. R. M. 8086 of 2019

In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on
03.09.2019 in connection with Egra Police Station Case No. 663 of 2018 dated
14.12.2018 under Sections 498A/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R.E. No. 1035 of


In Re: Manuja Bibi Anr.

… … Petitioners
Mrs. Pronoti Goswami .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Mr. Bidyut Kumar Roy .. Advocate
Ms. Rita Datta .. Advocate
… … for the State

The petitioners are seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences

punishable under Sections 498A/Section304B/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody for about 60

days. It is further submitted that the principal accused i.e. the husband has been enlarged

on bail.

Learned Counsel for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer

for bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the general and

omnibus nature of allegations levelled against the petitioners and in view of the period of

detention suffered by them and as principal accused i.e. the husband of the victim-

housewife has been enlarged on bail, we are of the opinion that further detention of the

accused/petitioners is not necessary.


Therefore, the accused/petitioners, namely (1) Manuja Bibi (2) Sk. Illias, be

released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each,

with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of

the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Contai, Purba Medinipur subject to

condition that the said petitioners shall appear before the trial court on every date of

hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in

any manner whatsoever.

In the event they fail to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the

trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail automatically without reference to this


The application for bail, thus, stands allowed.

(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation