SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

2019 Dated 02.08.2019 Under … vs In Re: Sanjit Kumar Mondal on 3 September, 2019



Sl. No.44
C. R. M. 7755 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 22.08.2019 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 151 of
2019 dated 02.08.2019 under Sections 498A/Section307/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.


In Re: Sanjit Kumar Mondal
… … Petitioner

Mr. Sourav Chatterjee .. Advocate
Mr. Asraf Mandal .. Advocate
… … for the petitioner

Mr. Sataroop Purukayastha .. Advocate
… … for the de-facto complainant

Mr. Imran Ali .. Advocate
Mr. Nirupam Dhali .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for the respective parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the instant case was registered

belatedly due to a matrimonial dispute.

Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate for the de-facto complainant opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail and submits that his client was forced to abort the unborn child.

We have considered the materials on record. There is a time gap of two months

in lodging FIR since the alleged abortion of the unborn child. Keeping in mind the

aforesaid fact, we are of the opinion though custodial interrogation of the

accused/petitioner may not be necessary, he requires to cooperate with the investigation

in accordance with law.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioner, namely

Sanjit Kumar Mondal, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of

the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that he shall

meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until further orders and shall appear before

the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation