SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

2019 Dated 06.02.2019 Under … vs In Re: Keshta Rajowar @ Kesto … on 26 March, 2019

1

26.03.19

Sl. No.106
akd
[ALLOWED]
C. R. M. 3391 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 19.03.2019 in connection with Shantipur Police Station Case No. 61 of
2019 dated 06.02.2019 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And

In Re: Keshta Rajowar @ Kesto Rajoar Ors.

… … Petitioners

Mr. Subir Debnath .. Advocate
Mr. Soham Banerjee .. Advocate
… … for the petitioners

Mr. Atif Ahmed Siddiqui .. Advocate
… … for the State

Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioner no.1 is the father-in-law

of the victim-housewife, petitioner no.2 is her uncle-in-law and petitioner nos.3 4 are the

aunts-in-law of the said housewife. It is further submitted that they have been falsely

implicated in the instant case.

Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and opposes the prayer

for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the extent of

complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime and in view of the fact that the principal

accuseds i.e. the husband and mother-in-law of the victim-housewife are in custody, we

are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioners may not be

necessary in the facts of the present case and they may be granted anticipatory bail.
2

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners,

namely (1) Keshta Rajowar @ Kesto Rajoar, (2) Utpal Rjoyar @ Utpal Rajoar, (3)

Dipali Rajoyar @ Dipali Rajoar (4) Chhabi Rajowar @ Sardar, be released on bail

upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two

sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject

to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973 and on further condition that they shall appear before the court below and pray for

regular bail within a fortnight from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation