SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Akhtar Malik & Anr. vs The State (Nct Of Delhi) & Anr. on 30 May, 2019

*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI +CRL.M.C.4416/2015CRL.M.A.15604/2015 Judgmentreservedon:02.05.2018 Dateofdecision:30.05.2019 AKHTARMALIKANR……Petitioners Through:Mr.SunilSharma,Advocate. versus THESTATE(NCTOFDELHI)ANR……Respondents Through:Mr.RaghuvinderVarma,APP forStatewithSIDevender Singh,PSGovindpuri. NoneforR-2. CORAM: HON’BLEMS.JUSTICEANUMALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANUMALHOTRA,J. 1.Thepetitionersi.e.AkhtarMaliks/oSh.HakimuddinandHanif Maliks/oSh.Hakimuddin,videthepresentpetitionseekquashingof theFIRNo.461/2013dated02.07.2013,PSGovindpuriunderSections 498A/Section406/Section34oftheIndianPenalCode,1860,andtheresultantcharge sheetsubmittingtotheeffectthattheyhavebeenarrayedasthe accusedpersonsincolumnno.11withouttheirarrestandthatthe learnedMetropolitanMagistratevideorderdated11.09.2015has takencognizanceandissuedsummonstothem,buttheyaredistant CRL.M.C.4416/2015Page1of18 relativesofthehusbandoftherespondentno.2,Ms.Rubyw/oSh. SaleemMalik,inasmuchasthey,thepetitionersarethematernal unclesoftheJethanii.e.thewifeoftheelderbrotherofthehusbandof thecomplainant/respondentno.2andthatthus,theallegations levelledagainstthemarefarfetchedandthattheydonotfallwithin theambitoftheterm’relativeofthehusband’underSection498Aof theIndianPenalCode,1860andthatthesummoningorderisbanned inlaw. 2.TheFIRregisteredintheinstantcasewaslodgedon 02.07.2013at7.15PMonthecomplaintmadebytherespondentno.2 i.e.thecomplainant,thewifeofSh.Saleem,s/oSh.Kamruddin,r/o H.No.T.A.308,GaliNo.5,Tuglakabad,NewDelhi,inwhichthe complainant/respondentno.2allegedthatshehadbeenharassedby herin-lawswithdowrydemandsandforhavingnotfulfilledthe demandsofherin-lawsofacarbyherfamilymembers.Asperthe FIR,initiallythebehaviorofherrelativeswasquitealrightbutafter shegavebirthtoasonon18.06.2005,herin-lawsi.e.herparents-in- law,herhusbandandotherfamilymembersstartedcompellingherin thehospitaltogivehersoninadoptiontohersister-in-law(Nanad) namedSmt.Bano,butwhenshe,thecomplainantrefusedtodoso,her…

K V Adisheshaiah vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 May, 2019

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.533 OF 2016 BETWEEN: 1. K.V.ADISHESHAIAH, S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAIAH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2. S.N.ANJALI RANI, W/O K.V.ADISHESHAIAH,…

Amitabh Sinha vs State Of Karnataka on 27 May, 2019

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27th DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4887/2018 BETWEEN: AMITABH SINHA S/O LATE M.C. SINHA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.179, TIWARIPUR FIRST P.O. SEWANS TANNERY…

Sri K V Muralidhar vs The State By Town Police on 28 May, 2019

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2086 OF 2019 BETWEEN: Sri K. V. Muralidhar, Son of Vittala Rao, Aged about 35 years, Residing at Kalpashree…

Jethu Ram vs Bhimu Through Her Lrs on 28 May, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA R.S.A. No. 640/2007 Decided on: 28.5.2019 . Jethu Ram …Appellant Versus Bhimu through her LRs ….Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whether approved for reporting ?1 No For the appellant: Mr. Ajay Kumar,…

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation