SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sri Debasish Chakraborty vs Smt. Soma Bhattacharjee on 29 May, 2019

Page 1 of 3 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA MAT. APP. NO.10 OF 2019 Sri Debasish Chakraborty, S/O Late Nikhil Chakraborty, R/O North Colony, Quarter No.A112, ONGC Complex, P.O. ONGC, P.S. Amtali, District-West Tripura. —-Appellant Versus Smt. Soma Bhattacharjee, W/O Debasish Chakraborty, R/O Gandhigram, Near…

Pranay Nath vs The State Of Tripura on 31 May, 2019

Page 1 of 20 HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA CRL.A.(J) NO.1 OF 2016 Pranay Nath son of Shri Bijoy Nath of Jolaibassa, Kadamtala, P.S. Kadamtala, District: North Tripura —-Appellant Versus The State of Tripura represented by the Secretary to the Government of Tripura, Home Department,…

Bablu @ Narendra Singh vs State Of U.P. on 30 May, 2019

HIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATALLAHABAD A.F.R Reservedon:10.4.2019 Deliveredon:30.5.2019 CourtNo.-7 Case:-CRIMINALAPPEALNo.-5908of2009 Appellant:-Bablu@NarendraSingh Respondent:-StateOfU.P. CounselforAppellant:-AjayKumarSingh,AnjaliRajpoot,DileepKumar,OmvirBabu,P.K.Rajpoot,VivekKumarSingh CounselforRespondent:-Govt.Advocate Hon’blePritinkerDiwaker,J. Hon’bleRajeevMisra,J. (DeliveredbyHon’bleRajeevMisra,J.) 1. Challengeinthiscriminalappealistothejudgementandorderdated24.8.2009,passedbytheAdditionalSessionsJudge(F.T.C.)CourtNo.7,BulandshahrinSessionsTrialNo.639of1999(StateVs.Bablu@NarendraSingh).Undertheimpugnedjudgementandorder,theaccusedappellantBablu@NarendraSinghhasbeenconvictedunderSectionsection304BI.P.C.andconsequentlysentencestolifeimprisonment.HehasalsobeenconvictedunderSectionsection498AIPCbutbyreasonofthejudgementreportedin2005(52)ACC1912,SunilGargVs.StateofU.P.,hehasnotbeensentencedunderSectionsection498AIPC.TheaccusedappellanthasfurtherbeenconvictedunderSectionsection3oftheDowryProhibitionAct.Accordingly,hehasbeensentencedtofiveyearsrigorousimprisonmentalongwithfineofRs.15,000/-.Indefault,theaccusedappellantistoundergothreemonthsadditionalimprisonment.Lastly,theaccusedappellanthasbeenconvictedunderSectionsection4oftheDowryProhibitionAct.Assuch,hehasbeensentencedtotwoyearsrigorousimprisonmentalongwithfineofRs.1,000/-.Incaseofdefault,theappellantistoundergothreemonthsadditionalimprisonment. 2. IttranspiresfromtherecordthatthemarriageofappellantBablu@NarendraSinghwassolemnizedwithBabita(deceased)on1.12.1995inaccordancewiththeHinduRitesandCustoms.However,justaftertheexpiryofaperiodoffivemonthsandfifteendaysfromthedateofmarriage,anunfortunateincidentoccurredon15.5.1996,inwhichBabitathewifeoftheappellantdied.ItisthenatureofdeathofthedeceasedBabitawhichisrequiredtobedealtwithinthisappeal. 3. VijaySingh,aneighbouroftheaccused-appellantsubmittedawrittenreportdated15.5.1996oftheaforesaidoccurrenceatPoliceStationAurangabad,DistrictBulandshahr.P.W.3H.MRajveer Singhenteredthewrittenreportdated15.5.1996intheG.D.videreportNo.34dated15.5.1996.He,thereafter,scribedthecheckF.I.R.dated15.5.1996(Ext.Ka-2)whichwasregisteredasCaseCrimeNo.63of1996,underSectionsection302IPC,P.S.Aurangabad,DistrictBulandshahr. 4. AperusaloftheF.I.R.willgotoshowthatthesamehasbeenlodgedbythefirstinformantVijaySingh,againstunknownpersons.Thedate,timeandplaceofoccurrenceasmentionedintheF.I.R.is15.5.1996at7:00pminthehouseofthedeceased(Babita)whichissituateinvillagePipala,P.S.Aurangabad,DistrictBulandshahr.TheF.I.R.alsocontainsthedetailsregardingthetimeanddateofthelodgingoftheF.I.Rwhichis8:45pmon15.5.1996.S.I.-H.C.Panda(P.W.7)wasappointedastheEnquiryOfficer. 5. AfterthelodgingoftheF.I.R.dated15.5.1996,thePoliceofPoliceStationAurangabadcameintomotion.P.W.7,S.I.-H.C.PandawhowasappointedastheInvestigatingOfficerproceededwiththeinvestigationoftheaforesaidcasecrimenumber.AftercompletingtheformalitiesofenteringthewrittenreportandtheF.I.R.inthecasediary,herecordedthestatementofthescribeoftheF.I.R.namely,P.W.3RajveerSinghthefirstinformantSanjaySingh.Therefore,accompaniedbythefirstinformant,hevisitedtheplaceofoccurrenceandinspectedthesame.He,accordinglynotedtheinspectionmemodated15.5.1996inthecasediaryandpreparedthesiteplanoftheplaceofoccurrence(Ext.Ka-11).Healsorecoveredplainearthandearthmixedwithbloodfromtheplaceofoccurrenceandsealedthemseparately.Healsorecoveredthebedsheetwhichwashavingbloodstains.Thesamewassealed.Healsorecoveredbrokenpiecesofbanglesofthedeceasedwhichwerealsosealed.Inrespectoftheabove,hepreparedtherecoverymemodated15.5.1996(Ext.Ka-12).TheaforesaidrecoveryiswitnessedbyoneChoteLalSharma. 6. AftercompletingtheaforesaidformalitiesP.W.4,S.I.RamGopalYadavtookpossessionofthedeadbody.He,thereafterappointedthepanchwitnessesnamely,ChoteLalSharma,GyanSharma,ChandraPal,RajmalSinghandSatpalSingh.Intheopinionofthepanchwitnesses,thedeathofthedeceasedwashomicidal.Accordingly,P.W.7theInvestigatingOfficerS.I.-H.C.Pandapreparedtheinquestreportdated15.5.1996(Ext.Ka-5). 7. Theinquestreportclearlycontainsthecasecrimenumberinwhichitwasprepared,thedateandtimingoftheinquest,theofficerunderwhomtheinquestwasconductedandalsotheconditionofthedeadbodyofthedeceasedaswellastheinjuriesfoundonthesame. 8. HavinggottheinquestofthedeceasedconductedP.W.7S.I.H.C.PandapreparedthedetailedPolicescrollforgettingthePost-mortemofthebodyofthedeceasedconducted.He,accordinglypreparedPoliceFormNo.13(Ext.Ka-6).Letterdated16.5.1996addressedtotheC.M.O.BulandshahrforgettingthePost-mortemofthebodyofthedeceasedconducted(Ext.Ka-7).Photographofthedeadbodyofthedeceased(PhotoNash)(Ext.Ka-8).He,thereafter,packedandsealedthedeadbodyofthedeceasedanddispatchedthesameforPost-mortem. 9. P.W.5Dr.U.S.FaujdarconductedthePost-mortemofthedeadbodyofthedeceasedon16.5.1996.IntheopinionoftheDoctor,thecauseofdeathofthedeceasedwasComaasaresultofantemorteminjuries.TheDoctorwhoconductedtheautopsyonthebodyofthedeceasednotedthefollowinginjuries: “(I) firearmwoundofentryonleftsideofscalp5cmabovetoleftearmeasuring2X1½cmXbraincavitydeep.Marginsareinverted.Nobleedingortattooingpresent-communicatingthroughandthroughtothewoundofexit.-Onrightsideofthescalpmeasuring8x6cmxbraincavitydeep-Marginsareeverted.Braintissueiscomingout.Thewoundissituated3cmabovetherightear. (ii)Laceratedwound1x½cmmuscledeeponrightsideofthechest.” Heaccordingly,preparedthePost-mortemreportdated16.5.1996(Ext.ka-9). 10. Whiletheaforesaidexercisewasundertaken,NarendraSingh,thefatherofthedeceasedBabitauponcomingtoknowaboutthedeathofhisdaughter,submittedawrittenreportdated16.5.1996atPoliceStationAuragabad,DistrictBulandshahr(Ext.Ka-1).Theaforesaidwrittenreportclearlyimplicatestheaccused-appellantofhavingcommittedthecrimeonaccountofnonfulfilmentofthedemandofdowrymadebyhim. 11. Uponthesubmissionofthewrittenreportdated16.5.1996(Ext.Ka-1),thecasewasalteredunderSectionsection304BIPC.Accordingly,theinvestigationofthecaseproceededinlinewiththeaforesaid. 12. Onthebasisofthematerialcollected,duringthecourseofInvestigation,theInvestigatingOfficeropinedtosubmitachargesheetagainsttheaccused-appellantunderSectionsection304B,498ASectionIPCandSections¾SectionDowryProhibitionAct.Accordingly,achargesheetdated16.6.1996(Ext.Ka-10)wassubmittedagainsttheaccusedappellantcallinguponhimtoanswerthechargesunderSectionsections304B,498ASectionIPCandSections¾SectionDowryProhibitionAct.Uponthesubmissionofthechargesheetdated16.6.1996,cognizancewastakenbytheCourtconcernedvideorderdated9.7.1996.ThereafterthecasewascommittedtotheCourtofSessionsandaccordingly,S.T.No.639of1999(StateVs.Bablu@NarendraSingh)cametoberegistered. 13. TheCourtbelowvideorderdated27.7.1999framedthechargesagainsttheaccusedappellant.Threeseparateanddistinctchargeswereframedagainsttheaccused-appellantbeingunderSectionsections304BIPC,498ASectionIPCandSections¾SectionDowryProhibitionAct. 14….

State vs Naresh Kumar & Ors. on 29 May, 2019

*INTHEHIGHCOURTOFDELHIATNEWDELHI CRL.A.479/2003 Reservedon:26.03.2019 DateofDecision:29.05.2019 INTHEMATTEROF: STATE…..Appellant Through:Ms.RadhikaKolluru,APPforState versus NARESHKUMARORS……Respondents Through:Mr.HarishKhanna,Advocate CORAM: HON’BLEMR.JUSTICESIDDHARTHMRIDUL HON’BLEMR.JUSTICEMANOJKUMAROHRI MANOJKUMAROHRI,J. 1.Thepresentproceedinghasbeeninstitutedtochallengethe acquittaloftherespondentsvidetheimpugnedjudgmentdated 25.02.2000inSessionsCaseNo.82/1995arisingoutofFIR No.431/1990,P.S.PunjabiBagh. 2.Theleavetoappeal,inthepresentcase,wasgrantedvideorder dated16.07.2003. 3.Thefactsoftheprosecution,asnotedbythetrialcourt,are: “Thecaseoftheprosecution,asdisclosedfromthepolice challan,isthaton3.11.1990complainantMangeRam CRLA479/2003Page1of20 movedanapplicationtotheincharge,P.P.,Madipuron whichsaidinchargepassedanorderforregistrationofthe caseu/s.363/366SectionIPCandinvestigationofthecasewas handedovertoASIRamDutt.Theapplicationwastothe effectthatgoldweighing15tolasandcashofRs.10,000/- werekeptinthehouseofthecomplainantandhisdaughter wasmissingsince11.30P.M.ofthepreviousnightwhen heandhiswifewereawaywiththeirelderdaughtertothe hospitalandonreturntheyfoundthatyoungerdaughter wasnotatthehousenorthegoldandcashwasatthe houseandprayedforsearchofhisdaughterandhis neighbourerNareshKumarr/o.WZ-868,VillageMadipur, wassuspectedinthecommissionofthecrime.SaidASI RamDuttapprehendedtheprosecutrixRachnaand accusedNareshon4.11.90nearPetrolPump,Kapesehra borderonthepointingoutofthecomplainantandgotthe prosecutrixandNareshexaminedmedically. 4.Initially,thecasewasinvestigatedunderthesupervisionofSI HarpalSingh,Incharge,PolicePost,Madipur.On4.11.1990,astatement oftheprosecutrixwasrecordedunderS.161SectionCr.P.C.Thereafter,ona complaintfiledbythefatheroftheprosecutrixagainstSIHarpalSingh,…

Parambil Appukuttan vs Parol Krishnan on 27 May, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2019 / 6TH JYAISHTA, 1941 Mat.Appeal.No. 77 of 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 145/2010 of FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM DATED 22-10-2010…

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation