tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. 8128 of 2019
sl no. 84
In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Sectionsection 438 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 4.9.2019 in connection with Kandi
P.S case no. 296 of 2018 dated 26.8.2018 under Sectionsections
498A/Section201/Section302/Section34 of the IPC and 3/4 of the DP Act
In Re : Bamacharan Mondal @ Bamacharan Anr.
Mr. M. K. Das
Ms. A. Chel
…… for the petitioners
Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, ld PP
Mr. R. D. Nandi
…… for the State
Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are
no way related to the deceased.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioners were found
near the place where the dead body of the victim was recovered
and it has been alleged that they were in conspiracy with the
absconding accused i.e the husband of the victim lady to
We have considered materials on record including the
statements of witnesses who found petitioners were moving near
the place from where the dead body of the victim lady was
Keeping in mind the prima facie involvement of the
petitioners in the alleged crime and as custodial interrogation in
this grave crime may reveal proof of conspiracy leading to the
homicidal death of the victim, we are of the opinion that this is
not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Jay Sengupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)