1

13.11.2019

Sl No.124
AP
CRM 10428 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 11.11.2019 in connection with Rejinagar Police
Station Case No. 204 dated July 31, 2019 under Sections
498A/Section302/Section304(B)/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And

In Re: Ijajul Sk. @ Ejajul Sk. Ors.

… … Petitioners.

Mr. Rajeshwar Chakraborty,
… for the petitioners.

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Ld. P.P.,
Mr. Aniket Mitra
… … for the State.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that they are in-laws of the

victim housewife and have been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is

further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the incident occurred six years

after marriage.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having considered the materials in the case diary disclosing prima facie

involvement of petitioner No.3, mother-in-law of the victim housewife, in abetting

her suicide, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.3.

However, keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioner Nos.1

and 2, brothers-in-laws of the victim housewife, in the alleged crime, we are

inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner Nos.1 and 2.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner Nos.1 and

2 be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
2

Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction

of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the

petitioner Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the court below and pray for regular

bail within a period of four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)