1

03.01.2020
14

sdas
allowed

C.R.M. No. 11997 of 2019

In Re.: An application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 17.12.2019 in
connection with Chakdaha Police Station Case No. 494 of 2019 dated 05.12.2019 under Sections
498A/Section302/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And
In Re: Beuti Das alias Beauty Das Ors. ……… petitioners

Ms. Minoti Gomes
…for the petitioners

Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, learned P.P.,
Mr. Aniket Mitra
… for the State

It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners that they are married sisters-

in-law of the victim housewife and did not reside at the matrimonial home of the victim.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered the materials on record. Allegations against

the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. Having considered

the materials on record in the light of the aforesaid submission made on

behalf of the petitioners that they did not ordinarily reside at the

matrimonial home of the victim, we are inclined to grant anticipatory

bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners

shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each,

with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the

arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on condition
2

that the petitioners shall appear before the court below and pray for

regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)