SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

498A/304B/302/34 Of The Indian … vs In Re : Mujibar Rahman Khan @ Titon & … on 25 June, 2018

1

25.06.2018
38

sdas
Rejected

C.R.M. 4122 of 2018

In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 22.06.2018 in connection with Khargram Police
Station Case No. 87 of 2018 dated 10.04.2018 under Sections
498A/304B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And
In Re : Mujibar Rahman Khan @ Titon Anr. ….. petitioners

Mr. Pratip Kumar Chatterjee
… for the petitioners

Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, learned P.P.,
Mr. Partha Pratim Das
… for the State

Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners are in custody for 68 days and they are falsely implicated

in the instant case. It is further submitted that the victim suffered

from depression and had attempted to commit suicide earlier.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for

bail.

Having considered the materials on record we find that the

victim had committed suicide within two years of her marriage. There

are statements connecting the petitioners with the torture of the victim

housewife. From the medical report annexed to the petition we do not

find any material showing that the victim was suffering from mental

depression. On the other hand, the fact that the victim attempted to
2

commit suicide earlier probabilises the allegation of continued torture

on her.

In view of the aforesaid facts and that the investigation is still

in progress, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this

stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
3

C.R.M. 192 of 2018

In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur
Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under
Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

And
In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ….. petitioner

Mr. Asraf Ali
… for the petitioner

Mr. Debojyoti Deb
… for the State

Having considered the materials on record prima facie

disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of

misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the

fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of

time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this

stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation