C.R.M. No. 11729 of 2019
In Re.: An application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 11.12.2019 in
connection with Santipur Police Station Case No. 699 of 2019 dated 01.12.2019 under Sections
498A/Section307/Section506 of the Indian Penal Code.
In Re: Mithun Pramanik Ors. ……… petitioners
Ms. Minoti Gomes
…for the petitioners
Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh,
Mr. M.F.A. Begg
… for the State
Ms. Joyeeta Roy
…. for the defacto complainant
It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners that they are the husband and
in-laws of the defacto complainant and have been falsely implicated in the instant case.
Learned Counsel appearing for the opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Learned Counsel appearing for the defacto complainant also opposes the prayer for anticipatory
Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind
the nature of allegations, we are of the opinion that custodial
interrogation of the petitioners is not required and they may be granted
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners
shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each,
with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the
arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on further
conditions that petitioner no. 1 shall meet the investigating officer once
in a week until further orders and shall appear before the court below
and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)