1

11.11.2019

Sl No.123
AP
CRM 10331 of 2019

In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 07.11.2019 in connection with Daspur Police
Station FIR No. 419/2019 dated 19th October, 2019 under Sections
498A/Section323/Section307/Section406/Section34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And

In Re: Arun Maji
… … Petitioner.

Mr. Sayantan Hazra,
… for the petitioner.

Mr. Sujoy Sarkar
… … for the State.

Mr. Tushar Kanti Har,
Mr. Somnath Chakraborty,
Mr. Sudip Chakraborty
… for the de facto complainant.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely

implicated in the instant case.

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Learned lawyer for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner has similar antecedents.

Having considered the materials in the case diary and bearing in mind the

nature of allegations and as no external injury is noted in the medical report, we

are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released

on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only),

with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer

and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the
2

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner

shall meet the investigating officer once in a week until further orders and on

condition that the petitioner shall appear before the court below and pray for

regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Manojit Mandal, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)