SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

498A/324/307/34 Of The Indian … vs In Re : Buddhadev Guria on 8 May, 2018



C.R.M. 2001 of 2018

In Re:- An application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure filed on 03.05.2018 in connection with Chandipur Police
Station Case No. 35 of 2018 dated 26.02.2018 under Sections
498A/324/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.


In Re : Buddhadev Guria …… petitioner

Mr. Biswapriya Samanta
…..for the petitioner

Mr. Arijit Ganguli,
Ms. Sujata Das
….for the State

It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the

petitioner that there is a domestic dispute between the defacto

complainant and the husband of the victim and the petitioner is the

step son of the defacto complainant has been falsely implicated in the

instant case.

Learned Counsel appearing for State opposes the prayer for

anticipatory bail and submits that the victim has been suffered from

electric shock at her residence.

Having considered the materials on record we note that

domestic dispute was over the issue of gift of ancestral property to the

petitioner. It is unclear from the medical report as to whether electric

burn was accidental or inflicted by the hostile hands. We are of the

opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be

necessary in the facts of the case but his movement requires to be

restricted in order to instill confidence in the mind of the defacto


Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner

shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with

two sureties of like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer

and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on condition that he shall not

enter the jurisdiction of Chandipur Police Station except for attending

the police station until further orders and he shall provide the address

where he shall presently reside to the investigating agency as well as

the learned Court below.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation