CRM No. 10753 of 2019
In Re:- An application for Anticipatory Bail under Sectionsection 438 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure filed on 4th November, 2019 in connection with
Dankuni Police Station Case No. 227 dated 08.09.2019 under Sections
498A/Section406 of the Indian Penal Code.
In Re:- Uddipan majumder
Mr. Supriyo Das
… for the petitioner
Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg
…for the State
Mr. Subhajit Chowdhury
… for the defacto complainant.
Heard the learned advocate appearing for the parties.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that most of the Stridhan
articles have been returned.
Learned advocate for the defacto complainant opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail and submits that gold articles have not been returned.
Report is placed on record wherefrom it appears that Stridhan articles
have been recovered.
In view of the aforesaid fact and bearing in mind the nature of allegations,
we are of the opinion that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be
necessary in the facts of the present case and he may be granted anticipatory
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released
on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only),
with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting
officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2)
of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that he shall
meet the Investigating Officer once in a week until further orders and shall
appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)