SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Chimanbhai Dahyabhai Parmar vs State Of Gujarat on 14 June, 2017

R/CR.MA/14116/2017 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 14116 
of 2017

CHIMANBHAI DAHYABHAI PARMAR….Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT….Respondent(s)

Appearance:

MR SURESH B BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS JIRGA JHAVERI APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM:  HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH H.SHUKLA
 
 Date : 14/06/2017
 
ORAL ORDER

1. The   present   application   is   filed   by   the 

applicant­accused   for   grant   of   regular   bail   under 

Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The applicant­accused (father­in­law) is charged 

with   having   committed   offences   under   Sections   498A, 

302 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, for which FIR 

being C.R. No. I­2 of 2017 has been registered with 

Khambholaj Police Station, District : Anand.

Page 1 of 4

HC-NIC Page 1 of 4 Created On Wed Jun 14 23:48:56 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/14116/2017 ORDER

3. Heard learned advocate Shri Suresh Bhatt for the 

applicant­accused   and   learned   APP   Ms.   Jirga   Jhaveri 

for the respondent­State.

4. Learned   advocate   Shri   Suresh   Bhatt   referred   to 

the   background   of   the   facts   and   submitted   that   the 

applicant is the father­in­law, who was not present at 

the   time   of   the   incident   and,   therefore,   the 

application may be allowed.

5. Learned   Public   Prosecutor   Ms.   Jirga   Jhaveri   for 

the respondent – State however, resisted and submitted 

that having regard to background of the facts and the 

role   attributed,   the   present   application   may   not   be 

allowed.

6. In   view   of   the   rival   submissions   and   having 

regard to the background of the facts, role attributed 

and the manner in which the offence is alleged to have 

been committed, the present application deserves to be 

allowed.   However,   considering   the   background   of   the 

facts and having regard to the broad guidelines laid 

done by the Apex Court with regard to the criteria for 

Page 2 of 4

HC-NIC Page 2 of 4 Created On Wed Jun 14 23:48:56 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/14116/2017 ORDER

the   grant   of   regular   bail,   the   present   application 

deserves to be allowed.

7. Accordingly, present application stands allowed. 

The   applicant   is   ordered   to   be   released   on   regular 

bail in connection with C.R. No. I­2 of 2017 has been 

registered with Khambholaj Police Station, District : 

Anand,  on his executing a bond of Rs.5,000/­ (Rupees 

Five   Thousand   Only)   with   one   solvent   surety   each   of 

the like amount to the satisfaction of the lower Court 

and subject to the conditions that he shall:

(a) not take undue advantage of his  liberty or 
abuse his liberty.

(b) not   to   try   to   tamper   or   pressurize   the  
prosecution witnesses or complainant in any 
manner.

(c) not   act   in   any   manner   injurious   to   the  
interest of the prosecution.

(d) maintain law and order and should cooperate 
the investigating officers.

(e) furnish the address of his residence to the 
Investigating Officer and also to the Court 
at   the   time   of   execution   of   the   bond   and 
shall not change his residence without prior  
permission of the Court.

(f) surrender his passport, if any, to the lower  
Court, within a week.

Page 3 of 4

HC-NIC Page 3 of 4 Created On Wed Jun 14 23:48:56 IST 2017
R/CR.MA/14116/2017 ORDER

(g) mark   his   presence   before   concerned   Police 
Station   1st  and   10th  day   of   every   calender 
month between 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM.

8. If   breach   of   any   of   the   above   conditions   is 

committed, the concerned Sessions Judge will be free 

to   issue   warrant   or   take   appropriate   action   in   the 

matter.

9. Bail   before   the   lower   Court   having   jurisdiction 

to try the case. It would be open to the trial Court 

concerned   to   give   time   to   furnish   the   solvency 

certificate if prayed for.

10. Rule is made absolute. Direct service permitted. 

(RAJESH H.SHUKLA,  J.) 

/phalguni/

Page 4 of 4

HC-NIC Page 4 of 4 Created On Wed Jun 14 23:48:56 IST 2017

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation