SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sukhdeep Singh vs State on 20 July, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4852 / 2017
Sukhdeep Singh S/o Shri Iqbal Singh, By Caste Jatsikh, Resident
of Professor Colony, Mansa (Punjab).

—-Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor.

—-Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 4530 / 2017

1. Iqbal Singh Son of Shri Gurcharan Singh

2. Amarjeet Kaur Wife of Iqbal Singh, Both by Caste Jatsikh,
Resident of Professor Colony, Mansa (Punjab)

—-Petitioners

Versus

State of Rajasthan

—-Respondent
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.S. Thind
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore, Public Prosecutor.
__
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
20/07/2017

Petitioners have filed these pre-arrest bail applications

apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.53/17 Police

Station Mahila Thana, District Sri Ganganagar.

In the FIR aforesaid, petitioners are charged for offences

punishable under Sections 406, 498A, 354, 420 and 323 IPC.

(2 of 2)
[ CRLMB-4852/2017]

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

Public Prosecutor, and perused the materials available on record

including the case diary.

Upon perusal of the available material and case diary, in the

backdrop of criminal delinquency attributed to the petitioners, I

am at loss to say that no case for pre-arrest bail is made out.

Undeniably, the petitioners are charged for offence under

Sections 406, 498A, 420 and 323 IPC and petitioner Iqbal Singh is

charged for offence 354 IPC, and investigation in the matter is still

in vogue. In view thereof, I feel persuaded to thwart both these

bail applications.

Accordingly, both these pre-arrest bail applications are

rejected.

Before parting, it is observed that in case petitioners

surrender before learned trial Court and apply for bail, their bail

application(s) be considered objectively, strictly in accordance with

law.

( P.K. LOHRA)J.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh