IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.SUDHEENDRA KUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2017/7TH ASHADHA, 1939
Crl.MC.No. 4267 of 2017 ()
—————————
CC 900/2012 of ADDL.C.J.M.,TRIVANDRUM
CRIME NO. 693/2012 OF MECICAL COLLEGE POLICE STATION ,
THIRUVANANDAPURAM
PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NOS. 1 TO 5:
———————————
1. S.SARAVANAKUMAR
S/O.SADAGOPALAN, AGED 37,
S.S.NILAYAM, SIVANAGAR,
KANJIKKODE, PALAKKAD-678 621.
2. SADAGOPALAN
S/O.ARUNACHALAM PILLAI, AGED 67,
S.S.NILAYAM, SIVANAGAR,
KANJIKKODE, PALAKKAD-678 621.
3. S.SANTHOSHKUMAR
S/O.SADAGOPALAN,S.S.NILAYAM, SIVANAGAR,
KANJIKKODE, PALAKKAD-678 621.
4. C.K.MAYA
D/O.SADAGOPALAN,S.S.NILAYAM, SIVANAGAR,
KANJIKKODE, PALAKKAD-678 621.
BY ADV. SRI.J.S.AJITHKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/STATE/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
—————————————-
1. STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,
(CRIME NO.71 OF 2013 OF
NEDUMANGADU POLICE STATION)
2. SUMITHA M.S.
D/O.SUDHAKUMARI AMMA, AGED 35,
VISAKHAM, B-20, TC 2/965/II PALOOR LANE,
MURINJAPALAM, PATTOM VILLAGE, MEDICAL COLLEGE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R2 BY ADV. SRI.RINU. S. ASWAN
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. E.C. BINEESH
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 28-06-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED
THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 4267 of 2017 ()
—————————
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
ANNEXURE A : TRUE COPY OF CHARGE SHEET
IN CC NO.900/2012 ON THE ADDITIONAL
CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
ANNEXURE B: ORIGINAL OF THE AFFIDAVIT
SWORN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT BEFORE
THE NOTARY PUBLIC DATED 15-4-2017.
RESPONDENT(S)’ EXHIBITS
———————–
B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, J.
————————————————-
Crl.M.C. No. 4267 of 2017
————————————————-
Dated this the 28th day of June, 2017
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused in C.C. No. 900 of
2012 on the files of the court below. The offence alleged is
the offence under Section 498A read with Section 34 IPC.
2. Heard.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for
the parties and the learned Public Prosecutor that the
matter has been settled between the parties. The 2nd
respondent, who is the de facto complainant, filed
affidavit stating that the matter has been settled between
the parties and hence, she has no further grievance against
the petitioners. The above dispute arose out of family
relationship. Therefore, since the matter has been settled
between the parties, I am inclined to quash Annexure-A
-2-
Crl.M.C. No. 4267 of 2017
final report and further proceedings against the petitioners
in C.C. No. 900 of 2012 on the files of the court below, in
exercise of the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,
to meet the ends of justice and accordingly, I order so.
In the result, this Crl. M.C. stands allowed.
Sd/-B. SUDHEENDRA KUMAR, JUDGE.
ani/