SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Kawal Singh vs Menka And Ors on 22 August, 2017

CR No. 3016 of 2014 -1-

207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH.

CR No. 3016 of 2014
Date of Decision: 22.08.2017

KAWAL SINGH
-PETITIONER
VS
MENKA
-RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ MOHAN SINGH

Present: Mr. Chanderhas Yadav, Advocate,
for the petitioner.

Mr. Vishal Malik, Advocate,
for the respondent.

****

RAJ MOHAN SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Vide order dated 12.12.2013, Additional District

Judge, Jhajjar granted an amount of Rs.3000/- per month

towards maintenance pendente lite and Rs.3300/- as one time

litigation expenses besides granting Rs.300/- per hearing for the

hearings to which respondent was to attend personally.

Petitioner has assailed the said order in the present

revision petition.

Notice of motion was issued on 22.05.2014 and both

the parties were directed to be present in the Court for the

purposes of mediation.

Vide order dated 09.02.2015, petitioner was directed

1 of 2
31-08-2017 23:22:23 :::
CR No. 3016 of 2014 -2-

to hand over bank draft in the name of the respondent to the

tune of Rs.15,000/- towards litigation/travelling expenses before

the Mediator on 10.03.2015 along with demand draft of upto

date arrears of maintenance.

The aforesaid order was not complied with by the

petitioner and the said fact was also noticed by this Court vide

order dated 24.04.2017.

Concededly, the amount has not been paid to the

respondent and mediation has failed. Even otherwise, the Court

below has noticed that the petitioner was serving as a Class-IV

employee in MCD (Municipal Corporation, Delhi). His mother is

also serving as a regular employee in the aforesaid corporation.

Grant of interim maintenance to the tune of Rs.3000/- per month

cannot be held to be on higher side. Moreover, the petitioner

has not complied with the order dated 09.02.2015 till date.

In view of above, no indulgence can be granted in

this revision petition.

The same is accordingly, dismissed.

22.08.2017 (RAJ MOHAN SINGH)
jyoti
JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
31-08-2017 23:22:25 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation