SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Jagdish Lal vs State Of Punjab on 1 November, 2017


Criminal Misc. No. M- 29911 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : November 01, 2017

Jagdish Lal …..Petitioner


State of Punjab and another ….Respondents


Present: Mr. Avtar Singh Bhatti, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurav Khurana, DAG, Punjab.


Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner in FIR No. 0157 dated 06.07.2017 under Sections 406, 498A IPC

registered at Police Station Adampur, District Jalandhar.

It is submitted that the matter has been amicably resolved

between the petitioner and his wife – respondent No. 2/complainant. Both of

them are now living together in their matrimonial home in peace and

harmony. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

Certified copy of order dated 26.09.2017 passed in petition

under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the petitioner,

produced in Court today is taken on record subject to just exceptions.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from HC

Bhagwant Singh, verifies that the petitioner and the complainant are now

living together in their matrimonial home in peace and harmony after an

amicable resolution of the dispute between them. The petitioner is not

reported to be involved in any criminal case.

1 of 2
04-11-2017 18:38:25 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 29911 of 2017 (OM) -2-

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioner is likely to abscond if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow this petition. In the event of his arrest, petitioner

shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer/

Arresting officer. He shall appear before the Investigating agency as and

when required. Petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated in

Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Lisa Gill)
November 01, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
04-11-2017 18:38:26 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh