THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28594/2017x
(Shahrukh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Shri R.R. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Bhuvan Deshmukh, learned Govt. Advocate for
the respondent/State.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this
petition .

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28383/2017x
(Hindu Ors. Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Shri N.J. Dave, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
applicants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this
petition with a liberty to renew the prayer after recording the
statement of the complainant before the learned trial Court.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28370/2017x
(Gopal Dangi Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Shri N.J. Dave, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this
petition with a liberty to renew the prayer after recording the
statement of the prosecutrix before the learned trial Court.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28282/2017
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for time to file
some documents in support of this petition.

Prayer is allowed.

Be listed in the week commencing 15/01/2018.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28254/2017
(Ansar Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Shri M.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this
petition .

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28153/2017
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Parties through their counsel.
Case-diary is not available today.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for time to produce the
case-diary by next date of hearing positively.

Prayer is allowed.

Be listed in the next week.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28150/2017
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the applicant prays for time to file
the copy of the charge-sheet.

Prayer is allowed.

Be listed in the next week.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.28146/2017
(Sachin Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Shri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this
petition with a liberty to renew the prayer after recording the
statement of the prosecutrix before the learned trial Court.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.27267/2017
(Jitendra Singh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Shri N.J. Dave, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Pankaj Wadhwani, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the
applicant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.27032/2017
Indore dated : 02/01/2018
Parties through their counsel.
Case-diary is not available today.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to produce the case-diary by next date of hearing positively.

Be listed in the week commencing 08/01/2018.

(S.K. Awasthi)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 4133/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Shri Manoj Saxena, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.24291/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicant No.2-Bhagwan Singh for suspension of
custodial sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Sections 420, 467, 468 and 120-B of the IPC and has been
sentenced to undergo 5 years R.I. and to pay fine of Rs.200 for
each offence with usual default stipulation.

Learned counsel for the applicants has invited the attention
of the Court to the testimony of Vinod Tirkey (P.W.1), who at the
relevant time, was posted as Sub-Registrar and further attention
has been invited to para No. 22 of the impugned judgment. It is
submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that disputed
signatures were not sent for examination by the hand-writing
expert. The contention is that learned trial Court has not properly
appreciated the evidence on record and that conviction has been
recorded on the basis of surmises and conjectures. It is also
submitted that the applicant No.2 was on bail during trial and the
liberty so granted was not misused by him. Lastly, it is
submitted that there is no apprehension of the applicant running
away from the course of justice, if released on bail.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant No.2-Bhagwan Singh.

Accordingly, I.A. No.24291/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing of fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by the applicant No.2-Bhagwan Singh
in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a
solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Court for his appearance before the Court, the execution of
custodial part of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the
final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant No.2- Bhagwan Singh after being enlarged
on bail, shall mark his presence before the registry of this Court
on 19/02/2018 and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed
in this regard by the Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 471/2017x
Indore dated :20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let fresh bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.25,000/- be
issued against petitioner-Gajanand for securing his presence
before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1608/2016x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is
granted a week’s time to cure the defects pointed out by the
Office.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.814/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is
granted time to file appropriate application with regard to
exemption from filing affidavit in support of IA No.
3609/2017.

Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.617/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5860/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Ms. A. Maheshwari, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
24417/2017, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
for condonation of delay of 471 days in preferring this appeal .

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that
the appellant is facing trial for offences under Sections 302, 451,
294/34 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (PA) Act,
1989 and he is in jail for last 22 months.

For the reasons assigned in the application, which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.24417/2017 is allowed and delay of
471 days in preferring this appeal is hereby condoned.

Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time to
comply with Section 15(A)(3) of the SC/ST (PA) Act, 1989 so
also to produce case-diary.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.7047/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.9064/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to cure the defects pointed out by the
Office.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.26380/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file documents in support of the petition.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.917/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Petitioner-Mohit Jain is present in person.
None for the respondent.

This is a revision petition under Section 19(4) of
Family Court Act read with Section 397 of Cr.P.C.
challenging order dated 12/07/2016 passed by 2nd Additional
Principal Judge, Indore in H.M.A. No. 987/2014, whereby
interim maintenance @ Rs.1,000/- per month has been
granted in favour of the respondent under Section 24 of the
Hindu Marriage Act.

It is submitted by the petitioner that vide order dated
04/09/2015 (Annx. P/3) already interim maintenance @
Rs.2,500/- has been granted in favour of respondent-Sonali
Jain, therefore, learned Family Court has committed serious
error in again awarding interim maintenance in favour of the
respondent. He prays for staying the operation of the
aforesaid order.

Considering the fact that respondent is already getting
interim maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. vide
order dated 04/09/2015 (Annex. P/3), the operation of order
dated 12/07/2016 is directed to be stayed till next date of
hearing.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr. R. No. 1453/2016x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Shri N.J. Dave, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
25762/2017, an application for condoning absence of petitioners

-Pannalal and Murlidhar on 11/10/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the petitioners.

Accordingly, IA No. 25762/2017 is allowed and the
absence of petitioners- Pannalal and Murlidhar on 11/10/2017 is
hereby condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the petitioners,
petitioners -Pannalal and Murlidhar are present today before this
Court. They are directed to mark their presence in the Office
today and on all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the
Office in this behalf.

List the revision for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20151/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20052/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to call FSL report.

Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.27432/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21841/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20163/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22176/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20591/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 21122/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 21360/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21640/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21749/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21952/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to complete case-diary.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22233/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file documents in support of the petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22424/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22695/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
ensuing winter vacation on any Wednesday.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23321/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 23514/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24120/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file documents in support of the petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24859/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file documents in support of the petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.19963/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Shri Anshul Shrivastava, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Shri Jalaj Pawar, learned counsel for the
objector/complainant.

As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.19191/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.18257/2017x
Indore dated : 20/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.18715/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to comply with order dated 06/12/2017.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.19744/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor further prays for and is
granted time to submits the report with regard to factum of
illness of the petitioner and seriousness thereof.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20198/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file affidavit as to whether Kalu Singh-father
of the petitioner is alive or not?

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20847/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.

As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 22112/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23149/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25043/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to ascertain whether prosecution witness-Salim
has been examined or not ?

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.2874/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Shri Balendu Dwivedi, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri Navneet Kishore Verma, learned counsel for the
respondent.

Office is directed to list the matter immediately after
ensuing winter vacation alongwith the record of Cr.R. No.
672/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.4696/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3879/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No. No. 27231/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
already cured the defects pointed out by the Office.

Office is directed to examine and proceed further.
Case-diary will kept in attendance on next date of
hearing.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.No. 454/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.1067/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
already cured the defects pointed out by the Office.

Office is directed to examine and proceed further.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.882/2015x

Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Shri Anil Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
24727/2017, an application for condoning absence of
petitiioner -Deepak on 15/05/2017.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this IA No.
24727/2017 .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, IA No. 24727/2017 is dismissed as
withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 22360/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

By way of indulgence two weeks’ time is granted to
the learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects
pointed out by the Office.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1111/2011x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Shri V.S. Parihar, learned counsel for the appellants.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
25584/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellant
No.3-Dilip Singh @ Manohar Singh on 24/10/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellant No.3.

Accordingly, IA No. 25584/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellant No.3- Dilip Singh @ Manohar Singh on
24/10/2017 is hereby condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellants,
appellant No.3-Dilip Singh @ Manohar Singh is present today
before this Court. He is directed to mark his presence in the
Office today and on all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed
by the Office in this behalf.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.858/2016x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Pursuant to bailable warrant issued by this Court,
petitioner-Sampat Bai has been produced before this Court
under proper police custody from District-Jail, Mandsaur. Her
presence is marked. She be sent back to the concerned jail
under proper police custody.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25614/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Office is directed to examine and list the matter before
appropriate Bench and if an order of assignment is there the
same be placed on record.

Be listed on 20/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 25914/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.26107/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to verify the call details filed by the petitioner alongwith bail
petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3758/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.291/2012x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith Cr.A. No. 1232/2016.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1232/2016x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the appellant informs that IA No.
25004/2017 has already been disposed of by this Court and
appellant has been directed to remain present before this
Registry on 13/04/2018.

Office is directed to examine the matter and proceed
accordingly.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1234/2014x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1096/2014x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1095/2014x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.997/2016x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellants, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
R.P. No.1269/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.3625/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 3775/2017x
Indore dated : 19/12/2017
Shri Gaurav Laad, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.
Revision is admitted for final hearing.
Let record of the Courts’ below be requisitioned.
Also heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.24761/2017, first application under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of petitioner-Lokesh for suspension of custodial
sentence.

The petitioner has been found guilty for offence under
Section 498-A of the IPC and sentenced to undergo 3 months
R.I. and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/- with usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
compromise was arrived at between the parties and application
for compromise was filed before the learned trial Court,
however, vide order dated 27/12/2016 the learned trial Court
dismissed the application for composition on the ground that
offence is not compoundable. Certified copy of order dated
27/12/2016 has also been filed to substantiate this plea.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the fact that
compromise was arrived at between the parties, without further
commenting on the merits of the case, it would be appropriate to
suspend the custodial sentence of the petitioner.

Accordingly, I.A. No.24761/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing of fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by the petitioner in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
his appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this revision.

The petitioner after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 19/02/2018 and on
all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the
Registry.

List the revision for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23736/2017xx
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri Ashish Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’) praying for
quashment of charge-sheet filed in connection with Crime No.
106/2016 registered at Police-Station- Dharmpuri, District-
Dhar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case is
made out against the petitioner, therefore, he is entitled to be
discharged in the matter.

Per contra, it is submitted by the learned Govt. Advocate
that still charges have not been framed against the petitioner
before the learned trial Court, therefore, the petitioner may be
granted liberty to raise all objections raised herein before the
learned trial Court at the time of framing of charge. Thereafter if
petitioner feels aggrieved; he will invoke the jurisdiction under
Section 397/407 of the Cr.P.C. before this Court.

The plea raised on behalf of the learned counsel for the
respondent appears to be in accordance with law as well as
reasonable.

Accordingly, this petition is hereby dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty to raise all objections raised herein
before the learned trial Court at the time of framing of charge.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.935/2015x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Ms. Manjula Mukati, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Ramesh Gangare, learned counsel for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has
no instruction on behalf of the petitioner.

The case is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.790/2015x
(Manoharlal Vs. Beetabai Ors.)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri Shashank Shrivastava learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent No.2/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the sole
petitioner-Manoharlal has expired on 22/08/2017 and copy
of death certificate is also filed alongwith the list of
documents.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, this revision stands
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.789/2014x
(Anand Vs. Anshul)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri S.K. Golwalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has already undergone the entire jail sentence
imposed against him, therefore, he seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.788/2014x
(Anand Vs. Anshul)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri S.K. Golwalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has already undergone the entire jail sentence
imposed against him, therefore, he seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.786/2014x
(Anand Vs. Anshul)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri S.K. Golwalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has already undergone the entire jail sentence
imposed against him, therefore, he seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.784/2014x
(Anand Vs. Anshul)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri S.K. Golwalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner has already undergone the entire jail sentence
imposed against him, therefore, he seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.710/2014x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith Cr.R. No.626/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 626/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri Arvind Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No. 4108/2017,
an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for
condonation of delay of 1113 days in preferring this revision .

For the reasons assigned in the application, which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.4108/2017 is allowed and delay of
1113 days in preferring this revision is hereby condoned.

Also heard on the question of admission.
Revision is admitted for final hearing.
Let record of the Courts’ below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.4107/2017, first application under Section 397(1)) Cr.P.C. on
behalf of petitioner-Kailash for suspension of custodial
sentence.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
the petitioner is in jail for last 9 months. It is also submitted that
custodial sentence of co-accused Jagdish and Shambhulal has
already been suspended by this Court vide order dated
17/07/2014 passed in Cr.R. No. 710/2014. The submission is that
the petitioner is having parity with co-accused Jagdish and
Shambhulal.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the petitioner.

Accordingly, I.A. No.4107/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing of fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by the petitioner in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
his appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this revision.

The petitioner after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 19/02/2018 and on
all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the
Registry.

List the revision for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1595/2013x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Service report with regard to bailable warrant issued
against appellant No.2-Sugnabai is still awaited.

Office is directed to list the matter after two weeks’
alongwith service report.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1474/2013x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for fixed date
to keep present appellant-Dharmendra before this Court.

Prayer granted.

Be listed on 11/01/2018..

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 978/2013x
Indore dated :18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.25,000/- be
issued against appellant-Prahlad Singh for securing his
presence before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.326/2013x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 230/2004x
Indore dated :18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.25,000/- be
issued against appellant-Ransiya for securing his presence
before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 26594/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.No. 26537/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.9096/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
on 03/01/2018.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.1240/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
on 03/01/2018.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.6957/2016x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the petitioners.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.572/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Be listed alongwith M.Cr.C. No. 2402/2015.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2402/2015x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
on 10/01/2018.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.26128/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri S.C. Bagadia, learned Senior counsel with Shri
R.S. Chhabra, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Koustubh Pathak, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted time to file para-wise reply of the original
petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.
Till next date of hearing no final order shall be passed in
the matter.

Certified copy today.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23821/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State further
prays for and is granted time to file report in compliance of
Court’s order dated 24/11/2017 .

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23623/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21556/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State further
prays for and is granted two weeks’ time to comply with order
dated 14/11/2017 passed by this Court.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 460/2012x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri Vikas Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
22903/2017, an application for condoning absence of petitioner-
Sunil on 01/09/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the petitioner.

Accordingly, IA No. 22903/2017 is allowed and the
absence of petitioner- Sunil on 01/09/2017 is hereby condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the petitioner,
petitioner-Sunil is present today before this Court. He is directed
to mark his presence in the Office today and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this behalf.

List the revision for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1282/2014x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the appellant.

Shri Subodh Choudhary, learned counsel for the
respondent No.1.

Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent No.2/State.

Heard learned counsel for the respondents on IA No.
21720/2017, an application for condoning absence of respondent
No.1-Vinod on 08/11/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the respondent No.1.

Accordingly, IA No. 21720/2017 is allowed and the
absence of respondent No.1-Vinod on 08/11/2017 is hereby
condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the respondent
No.1,respondent No.1 -Vinod is present today before this Court.
He is directed to mark his presence in the Office today and on
all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this
behalf.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.24445/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24422/2017x
(Naresh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Shri Sanjay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24565/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24636/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24678/2017x
(Rakesh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Ms. Anamika Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25405/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor further prays for and is
granted time to call medical report of the petitioner’s wife.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25471/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.25549/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.81/2017x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Office is directed to examine and list the matter before
appropriate Bench on 21/12/2017 .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.755/2015x
Indore dated : 18/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Office is directed to examine and list the matter before
appropriate Bench on 20/12/2017 .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5755/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Shri Satish Jain, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.24131/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicant-Ashwini Kumar for suspension of
custodial sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Section 324 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo 6
months R.I. and to pay fine with usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted
that the applicant was on bail during trial and the liberty so
granted was not misused by him. Lastly, it is submitted that the
appeal is likely to take considerable time in its final hearing and
if the short sentence is not suspended then appeal shall be
rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.24131/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing of fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by the applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
his appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 06/02/2018 and on
all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the
Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.24382/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23965/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-
accused has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate
Bench of this Court.

Office is directed to examine and list the matter before
appropriate Bench in the next week .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3764/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.

Be listed after two weeks

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5678/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Be listed the matter immediately after ensuing winter
vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5686/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Shri Sunil Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.23980/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicant-Banesingh for suspension of custodial
sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Sections 354 and 354(A) of the IPC and has respecitvely been
sentenced to undergo 3 years R.I. and 1 years R.I. and to pay fine
with usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted
that the applicant was on bail during trial and the liberty so
granted was not misused by him. Lastly, it is submitted that the
appeal is likely to take considerable time in its final hearing and
if the short sentence is not suspended then appeal shall be
rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.23980/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing of fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by the applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
his appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 12/02/2018 and on
all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the
Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5941/2017x
Indore dated : 1512/2017
Shri Ramesh Gangare, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.24680/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicant-Rahis Khan for suspension of custodial
sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 and has been sentenced
to undergo 1 years R.I. and to pay compensation amount of
RS.11746/-.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted
that the applicant was on bail during trial and the liberty so
granted was not misused by him. Lastly, it is submitted that the
appeal is likely to take considerable time in its final hearing and
if the short sentence is not suspended then appeal shall be
rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.24680/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing of compensation amount and
on furnishing personal bond by the applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
his appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 13/02/2018 and on
all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the
Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5950/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Shri Akash Rathi, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.24699/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicants-Brijesh, Ravi, Golu, Laki and Anil for
suspension of custodial sentence.

Each of the applicants has been found guilty for offence
under Sections 354/34 323/34 (on 2 counts) of the IPC and
Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences
Act, 2012 and has respectively been sentenced to undergo 2
years R.I., 3 months R.I. 3 years R.I. and to pay fine with
usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted
that the applicants were on bail during trial and the liberty so
granted was not misused by them. Lastly, it is submitted that the
appeal is likely to take considerable time in its final hearing and
if the short sentence is not suspended then appeal shall be
rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicants.

Accordingly, I.A. No.24699/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on furnishing
personal bond by each of the applicants in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
their appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this appeal.

The applicants after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
their presence before the registry of this Court on 13/02/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard
by the Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1236/2014x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.23/2016x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith Cr.A. No.1028/2015.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1444/2015x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith Cr.A. No.1028/2015.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1078/2015x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith Cr.A. No.1028/2015.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1028/2015x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1817/2015x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
None for the appellant.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1138/2016x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1391/2016x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1083/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith Cr.A. No. 1072/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1072/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1109/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Temporary suspension has been sought on the ground
of appellant’s sister marriage.

Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to verify the factum of appellant’s sister’s marriage.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1387/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted time to file reply of IA 20377/2017.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 4483/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Shri Sanjay Saini, learned counsel for the appellants.
Shri Abhisehk Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Shri J. Pawar, learned counsel for the
complainant/objector.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
22786/2017, application for composition which is required to
be verified.

Parties are directed to remain present on 19/12/2017 at
11:30 a.m. before the Principal Registrar for verification.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3726/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted time to file para-wise reply of the original
petition.

Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.2703/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.3708/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.3931/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondent
No.2, list after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4212/2017
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4274/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4471/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
immediately after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4572/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4655/2017x
(Rohit Singh Vs. Smt. Pooja)
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Shri P.N. Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner.
After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition with a liberty to pursue appropriate
remedy at appropriate time before appropriate forum.

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4935/2017x
Indore dated : 15/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
in the week commencing 02/01/2018.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.6105/2006x
Indore dated : 14/12/2017
Shri Samarjeet Singh, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri S.L. Ahiwasi, learned counsel for the respondent.
List alongwith Cr.A. No. 236/2008.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.236/2008x
Indore dated : 14/12/2017
Shri Samarjeet Singh, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri S.L. Ahiwasi, learned counsel for the respondent.
Exhibit D/1 annexed in the record of the trial Court is a
photocopy and not the original one.

Learned counsel for the parties seeks time to ascertain
about the original one.

Prayer is granted.

List after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.951/2014x
Indore dated : 14/12/2017
Shri Piyush Dubey, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri A.S. Sisodia, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted two weeks’ time to argue the matter.

List in the first week of January, 2018.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23754/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed after a week.

I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.25653/2017
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is
granted time to file reply of the original petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.10703/2016x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is
granted time to argue the matter.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.2758/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
already paid the process-fee.

Office is directed to examine and proceed further.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 21880/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the respondent No.4 submits that
copy of annexed documents has not been supplied to him.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to supply
the copy of annexed documents to learned counsel for the
respondent No.4 during the course of the day.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5253/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Shri Sunil Gehlot, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
23951/2017 an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
for condonation of delay of 5 days in preferring this appeal
against conviction.

For the reasons assigned in the application, which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.23951/2017 is allowed and delay of 5
days in preferring this appeal is hereby condoned.

Further heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Let record of the Court below be requisitioned.
List the appeal for consideration of IA No. 22736/2017,
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5500/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is
granted two weeks’ time to file affidavit in support of IA NO.
23565/2017, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation
Act for condoning the delay of 49 days in preferring this
appeal.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5668/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Ms. Pooja Jain, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
24429/2017 an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
for condonation of delay of 24 days in preferring this appeal
against conviction.

For the reasons assigned in the application, which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.24429/2017 is allowed and delay of
24 days in preferring this appeal is hereby condoned.

Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
a week’s to comply with Section 15(A)(III) of SC/ST(PA)
Act, 1989 so also to produce case-diary .

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.26575/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the petitioner/State prays for
and is granted two weeks time to file affidavit in support of IA
No. 24604/2017, an application under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 79 days in preferring
this petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.26583/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the petitioner/State prays for
and is granted two weeks time to file affidavit in support of IA
No. 24612/2017, an application under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 23 days in preferring
this petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.26601/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the petitioner/State prays for
and is granted two weeks time to file affidavit in support of IA
No. 24615/2017, an application under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 117 days in
preferring this petition.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.483/2011x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for fixed date
to keep present appellant-Asharam before this Court.

Prayer granted.

Be listed on 16/01/2018..

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 548/2014x
Indore dated :13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.25,000/- be
issued against appellant-Ramkuresh for securing his
presence before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.1524/2015x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for fixed date
to keep present petitioner-Ashok Kumar before this Court.

Prayer granted.

Be listed on 11/01/2018..

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.1593/2016x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Office is directed to list the matter after two weeks with
regard to execution of bailable warrant issued against
respondents.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.86/2017x
(Rajju @ Raees Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Shri N.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition by submitting that it has been
rendered infructuous.

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.181/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for fixed date
to keep present complainant before this Court.

Prayer granted.

Be listed on 18/01/2018..

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.818/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.908/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Suspension of petitioner No.-3 is sought on the ground
of his illness. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that the petitioner No.3 is suffering from cancer.

Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted a week’s time to verify the factum of
illness of petitioner No.3.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R.No.3412/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.4067/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.17931/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted two weeks time to cure the defect pointed out by the
Office.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.26151/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Learned counsel for the complainant/objector is directed
to verify as to whether the confidential information said to
have been discreetly stolen and transfered to some other
person(s) by the petitioner is already on internet or not ?

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.3890/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.

Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.3890/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
None for the petitioners.

List after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A.No. 4139/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Shri Vikas Soni, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri M.R. Sheikh, learned counsel for the
complainant/objector alongwith the prosecutrix.

Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks adjournment.
Prayer is granted.

Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.7136/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.8656/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted a week’s time to file reply of the original
petition.

Be listed immediately thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.9971/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

List after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.9196/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.9757/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.10086/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Office is directed to issue notice to Fariyad, with regard
to cancellation of bail. Notice be made returnable within 2
weeks.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.10744/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks’.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.17819/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.18281/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to collect information whether the petitioner has
been acquitted in Criminal Case Nos. 3177/2011 and
3178/2011 pending before Special Railway Magistrate,
Raipur District-Chhatisgarh.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.18859/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.20063/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.20163/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21233/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file order-sheets of the learned trial Court
with regard to latest status of the trial of the case.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21584/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.21584/2017
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.21952/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to collect documents with regard to complicity of
petitioner-Neeraj in the alleged offence.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.22034/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.22590/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned Public Prosecutor, list after
ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.22903/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23335/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23418/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
on 18/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23424/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.22912/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23429/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23718/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is
granted a week’s time to file copy of the charge-sheet.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.23864/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.24014/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.22871/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.24081/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C.No.24176/2017x
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24376/2017
Indore dated : 13/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10389/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor further prays for and is
granted time to produce case-diary.

Be listed on 15/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.4259/2016x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As pointed out by the Office no report is required with
regard to service of SPC, therefore, matter be listed for hearing
on 04/01/2018.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.466/2017x
(Daulat Singh Ors Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri A.K. Saraswat, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent.

Shri M.S. Chandel, learned counsel for the
complainant/objector.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.1001/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.1101/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is
granted time to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.1443/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2428/2017x
(Sohanlal Mehta Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri A.S. Parihar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 551/2006x
Indore dated :11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let fresh bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.25,000/- be
issued against appellant-Malkhan for securing his presence
before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 602/2011x
Indore dated :11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let fresh bailable warrant in the sum of Rs.25,000/- be
issued against appellant-Bhanwerlal for securing his
presence before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 144/2011x
Indore dated :11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let fresh non-bailable warrant of arrest be issued
against appellant-Radheshyam for securing his presence
before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 164/2013x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Ms. V. Sumanlata, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
19367/2017, an application on behalf of appellant- Ramkirshna
Das seeking leave of this Court to mark his presence before the
learned trial Court instead of Registry of this Court. The prayer is
made on account of old age and illness of the appellant.

On due consideration, IA No. 19367/2017 is allowed and
appellant-Ramkrishna Das is permitted to mark his presence
before the learned trial Court on 16/01/2018 and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the learned trial Court in
this behalf.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 574/2014x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri Vikas Yadav, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
20186/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellant-
Rameshchandra Rai on 12/10/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellant.

Accordingly, IA No. 20186/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellant-Rameshchandra Rai on 12/10/2017 is
hereby condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellant,
appellant -Rameshchandra Rai is present today before this Court.
He is directed to mark his presence in the Office today and on
all such subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this
behalf.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1304/2008x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri Ramesh Gagare, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
24546/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellant-
Veeroo on 21/07/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellant.

Accordingly, IA No. 24546/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellant- Veeroo on 21/07/2017 is hereby condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellant,
appellant -Veeroo is present today before this Court. He is
directed to mark his presence in the Office today and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this behalf. .

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1261/2008x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri Balendu Dwivedi, learned counsel for the
appellants.

Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
20507/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellants-
Kamal Singh and Bhanwar Singh on 12/10/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellants.

Accordingly, IA No. 20507/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellants- Kamal Singh and Bhanwar Singh on
12/10/2017 is hereby condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellants,
appellants -Kamal Singh and Bhanwar Singh are present today
before this Court. They are directed to mark their presence in
the Office today and on all such subsequent dates, as may be
fixed by the Office in this behalf. .

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2662/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10511/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
The petitioner is seeking permission to go to America on
the ground that he is employed in T.C.S. Company.

He is directed to file affidavit alongwith copy of
employment letter with regard to his posting at Mishigan,
America as well to disclose for how much period he is
required to be in America.

Be listed on 18/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23203/2017x
(Rahees Khan Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri A.K. Saraswat, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .
Record of the trial Court if received in the High Court
be transmitted back to the concerned trial Court at the
earliest.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23324/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23585/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23577/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24000/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
None for the petitioners.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24430/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24195/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22112/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list in
the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21926/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
on 12/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21770/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Record reveals that the petitioner was not available for
almost 10 years because charge-sheet was filed sometimes in
the year 2006.

Let report be called from the learned trial Court as to
whether the petitioner was declared absconding for all these
years.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21590/2017x
(Mangilal Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 11/12/2017

Shri A.K. Saraswat, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this repeat (second) petition with a further
request that the learned trial Court may be requested to
expedite the trial.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in jail since
30/07/2014, prayer seems to be quite reasonable.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with a request to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial.

CC as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20888/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20853/2017x
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let report with be called from the learned trial Court as
direction contained in order dated 24/11/2017.

Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20825/2017x
(Vijay Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 11/12/2017
Shri Ashish Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 812/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Ms. Rekha Shrivastava, learned counsel for the
petitioners.

Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
23965/2017, an application seeking extension of time to
incorporate necessary amendments in the cause-title of of the
petition in pursuance of order dated 21/07/2017 passed by this
Court.

On due consideration I.A. No. 23965/2017 is allowed
and petitioners are permitted to carry out necessary
amendments in the petition within 10 days from today.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3632/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Courts below be requisitioned.
Be listed the matter immediately after receiving of the
record.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25461/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25469/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25471/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25542/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25555/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25549/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25635/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25641/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25644/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25645/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25649/2017x
(Vishnu Kumar Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 08/12/2017

Shri Yogesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition with a further request that the
learned trial Court may be requested to expedite the trial.

Prayer seems to be quite reasonable.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with a request to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial.

CC as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22450/2017x
(Rayyan Sheikh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Shri Vijay Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22533/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23569/2017x
(Tejubai Ors. Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Shri V.S. Parihar, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24175/2017x
Indore, Dated :08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor further prays for and is
granted a weeks time to collect criminal antecedents of the
petitioner, if any.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24246/2017
(Ramesh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Shri Gaurav Shrivastava, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

This is repeat (second) application under Section 439,
Cr.P.C by petitioner-Ramesh, who has been arrested by Police
on 17/05/2017 in Crime No.79/2017, Police Station-Soyat,
District-Agar, concerning offence under Section 376 of the
IPC .

First application came to be dismissed, vide order dated
10/08/2017 rendered in M.Cr.C. No. 8167/2017.

Repeat prayer for bail has been made solely on the ground
that proceedings before the learned trial Court are held-up
because the Court is lying vacant.

Prayer of grant of bail is strongly opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor.

Considering the seriousness of the offence, delay in trial
cannot by itself be a ground to release the petitioner on bail,
therefore, no ground is made out to release the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, this petition is hereby dismissed, however,
petitioner is granted liberty to move an application before the
learned Sessions Court for transfer of this case to another Court
which is functional.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24660/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file documents in support of the petition.

Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 5550/2017x
Indore dated : 08/12/2017
Shri Navneet Kishore, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.23573/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicants-Vishnu, Ratan, Vinod, Suresh, Bharat,
Radheshyam, Vikram and Hariram for suspension of
custodial sentence.

Each of the applicants has been found guilty for offence
under Sections 147 and 323/149 (5 count) of the IPC and has
respectively been sentenced to undergo 2 years R.I. and 1 years
R.I. and to pay fine with usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted
that the applicants were on bail during trial and the liberty so
granted was not misused by them. Lastly, it is submitted that the
appeal is likely to take considerable time in its final hearing and
if the short sentence is not suspended then appeal shall be
rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.23573/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on furnishing
personal bond by each of the applicants in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for
their appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial part
of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of
this appeal.

The applicants after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
their presence before the registry of this Court on 31/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard
by the Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24620/2017
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24746/2017
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25080/2017x
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to produce case-diary.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25083/2017x
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to produce case-diary.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24096/2017x
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22506/2017x
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.25084/2017x
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Ms. Sonali Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Temporary bail is sought on the ground of petitioner’s
illness. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is suffering from critical stage of ‘Tuberculosis’.

Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted time to call report with regard to medical
condition of the petitioner.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21347/2017x
(Meharban Singh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Shri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1460/2009
Indore dated : 07/12/2017
Shri Nitendra Bajpai, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

In this case appellant-Abdul Hamid has been sentenced
to undergo 15 years R.I. under Section 8/20 (b)(II) (c) r/w
Section 31 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985.

Office is directed to examine whether the matter has to
be placed before Division Bench.

List after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3438/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Shri Manish Manana, appearing on behalf of the
respondents prays for and is granted time to file Vakalatnama
and reply of the petition.

Be listed in the first week of January, 2018.
I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
R.P. 240/2016x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Office is directed to list the matter after two weeks
alongwith service report of notice on respondent No.2-
Ramesh.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.9261/2011x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the respondent, list
after two weeks.

I.R. to continue, till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 703/2012x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let fresh non-bailable warrant of arrest be issued
against appellant-Yogi Tejnath for securing his presence
before this Court.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.870/2014x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioners informs that
petitioner No.2-Ghisalal is no more, therefore, he prays for
and is granted time to take necessary amendment in the
cause-title of the petition.

Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 225/2015x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Shri Vinay Puranik, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No. 2929/2015,
an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for
condonation of delay of 223 days in preferring this appeal
against conviction.

For the reasons assigned in the application, which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.2929/2015 is allowed and delay of
223 days in preferring this appeal is hereby condoned.

List the matter on the question of admission and for
consideration of IA No. 1013/2015.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.1302/2016x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Report of bailable warrant issued against petitioner-
Kailashchandra is still awaited.

Office is directed to list the matter after three weeks
alongwith report of bailable warrant.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1378/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Shri Bhaskar Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No. 7158/2017,
an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for
condonation of delay of 82 days in preferring this appeal.

For the reasons assigned in the application, which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.7158/2017 is allowed and delay of 82
days in preferring this appeal is hereby condoned.

Also heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.7157/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. on
behalf of applicant-Rajesh @ Benaam for suspension of
custodial sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Section 435 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo 3
years R.I. and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- with usual default
stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted
that the applicant is in jail for last more than one year. Lastly, it
is submitted that the appeal is likely to take considerable time in
its final hearing and if the short sentence is not suspended then
appeal shall be rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits of
the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.7157/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on furnishing
personal bond by applicant in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty
Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before
the Court, the execution of custodial part of the sentence shall
remain suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 30/01/2018 and on
all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by the
Registry.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1758/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3073/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to argue the matter.

Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10266/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary and to ascertain latest
status of the trial.

Be listed on 18/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. No. 10538/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

By way of indulgence one week’s time is granted to the
learned counsel for the petitioner to cure the defects pointed
out by the Office.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 23332/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 23960/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to cure the defect pointed out by the Office.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 560/2006x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Shri Ravi Arora, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
24385/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellant-
Narayan on 10/08/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellant.

Accordingly, IA No. 24385/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellant-Narayan on 10/08/2017 is hereby
condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellant,
appellant -Narayan is present today before this Court. He is
directed to mark his presence in the Office today and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this behalf. .

Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.23243/2017, application for recalling of non-bailable
warrant issued against appellant-Narayan.

Considering the fact that absence of appellant-Narayan
has already been condoned by this Court, therefore, it would
be appropriate to recall the non-bailable warrant issued
against appellant.

Accordingly, IA No. 23243/2017 is hereby allowed and
non-bailable warrant issued against appellant-Narayan vide
order dated 07/11/2017 is hereby recalled.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.719/2013x
Indore dated:06/12/2017
Shri Harshwardhan Ptahak, learned counsel for the
applicant.

Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
19980/2017, repeat (third) application under Section 389(1)
Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant- Suresh @ Surjya for
suspension of custodial sentence.

It is revealed from the record that custodial sentence
imposed against the petitioner for offence under Section 394 of
IPC was earlier suspended by this Court vide order dated
01/09/2015, however, the petitioner has failed to mark his
presence on 11/11/2016 before the Registry of this Court
because he was detained in Jail in some other case. Later on
he was produced before this Court on 02/03/2017 pursuant to
production warrant issued against him.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that on account of being detained in jail in some other case
applicant could not mark his presence before this Court on
11/11/2016 before this Registry and that in future he would
abide by all the terms and conditions of the bail.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the
learned Public Prosecutor, however, considering the
aforesaid broad features of the case, without further
commenting on the merits of the case, it would be
appropriate to once again suspend the custodial sentence of
the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.19980/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Court for his appearance before the Court, the execution
of custodial part of the sentence shall remain suspended, till
the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
his presence before the registry of this Court on 30/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this
regard by the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1268/2014x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As per Office note case is wrongly listed today before
this Court, therefore, the case is adjourned.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.2725/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5606/2017x
Indore dated:06/12/2017
Shri K.S. Solanki, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
23713/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. on
behalf of applicant- Kanhaiyalal for suspension of custodial
sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Sections 456, 354 and 506(II) of the IPC and has respectively
been sentenced to undergo 3 years R.I., 2 years R.I. and 1
years R.I. and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- with usual default
stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also
submitted that the applicant was on bail during trial and the
liberty so granted was not misused by him. Lastly, it is
submitted that the appeal is likely to take considerable time
in its final hearing and if the short sentence is not suspended
then appeal shall be rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the
learned Public Prosecutor, however, considering the
aforesaid broad features of the case, without further
commenting on the merits of the case, it would be
appropriate to suspend the custodial sentence of the
applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.23713/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Court for his appearance before the Court, the execution
of custodial part of the sentence shall remain suspended, till
the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
his presence before the registry of this Court on 30/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this
regard by the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5642/2017x
Indore dated:06/12/2017
Shri Manan Dhakad, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
23832/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. on
behalf of applicant- Hemant for suspension of custodial
sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Section 323 of IPC r/w Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (PA) Act,
1989 and has been sentenced to undergo 1 months R.I. and to
pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- with usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has recorded the conviction without
considering serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions
present in the testimony of various witnesses. It is also
submitted that the applicant was on bail during trial and the
liberty so granted was not misused by him. Lastly, it is
submitted that the appeal is likely to take considerable time
in its final hearing and if the short sentence is not suspended
then appeal shall be rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the
learned Public Prosecutor, however, considering the
aforesaid broad features of the case, without further
commenting on the merits of the case, it would be
appropriate to suspend the custodial sentence of the
applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No.23832/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent
surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Court for his appearance before the Court, the execution
of custodial part of the sentence shall remain suspended, till
the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
his presence before the registry of this Court on 30/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this
regard by the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.999/2011x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1200/2007x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.302/2014x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.363/2014x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.947/2015x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
None for the appellant.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.694/2016x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Temporary suspension has been sought on the ground
of appellant mother’s illness.

Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to verity the factum of appellant’s mother’s illness.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.521/2017x
(Rajesh Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Shri Pramod Choubey, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.728/2016x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1036/2016x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
on 08/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1272/2016x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Shri N.J. Dave, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.20816/2017, first application under Section 389(1)
Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant-Jitendra for suspension of
custodial sentence.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave of this Court to
withdraw this application.

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, IA No. 20816/2017 is dismissed as
withdrawn.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.526/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
None for the appellant.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1083/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellants, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1094/2017x
Indore dated:06/12/2017
Shri A.K. Saraswat, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No. 5685/2017
and IA No. 22266/2017, first applications under Section 389(1)
Cr.P.C. respectively on behalf of applicants- Arun and Manju
for suspension of custodial sentence.

Each of the applicants has been found guilty for offence
under Section 306/34 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo 7
years R.I. and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- with usual default
stipulation.

As per prosecution, one Prakash Chouhan committed
suicide by hanging. The allegation against applicants is that the
deceased was entertaining suspicion with regard to fidelity and
character of his wife-applicant Manju. The suspicion was that
Manju was having love affair with applicant-Arun.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants
that even if all the allegations made against the applicants are
accepted at their face value still, prima-facie, no case for offence
under Section 306 of IPC is made out against applicants because
there is nothing on record to indicate that applicants ever
encouraged, incited, provoked or persuaded Prakash Chouhan to
commit suicide.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, looking to the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the case, without further commenting on the
merits of the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the
custodial sentence of the applicants.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 5685/2017 and IA No. 22266/2017
are allowed and it is directed that subject to depositing fine
amount and on furnishing personal bond by each of the
applicants- Arun and Manju in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs.
Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety in the like amount
to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for their appearance
before the Court, the execution of custodial part of the sentence
shall remain suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicants after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
their presence before the registry of this Court on 30/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard
by the Registry.

Listed for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1132/2017x
Indore dated : 06/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellants, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2420/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2532/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2542/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2695/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2736/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate prays for and is granted time
to file the reply of the original petition.

List after ensuing winter vacation.
I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2781/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.2824/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10224/2017x
(Irshad Khan Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Shri M.I. Answari, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Abhishek Soni, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10479/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Serious allegations have been made in this petition with
regard to modus-operandi of the Police Officials allegedly in
providing adequate security to petitioner-Anwar Khan as
directed by this Court vide order dated 05/10/2015 passed in
M.Cr.C. No. 8411/2015, therefore, respondent/State is
directed to file detailed para-wise reply supported with
affidavit of concerned Police Officials.

Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10720/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Govt. Advocate for the respondent/State prays
for and is granted time to file the reply of the original
petition.

Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
M.Cr.C. No.10383/2014
01/08/2017

Shri Manish Vijaywargiya, learned counsel for the
applicant.

Shri Ramesh Kumar Vishwakarma, learned counsel
for the respondent.

This is a petition under Section 378(4) Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘The Code’) praying
for grant of leave to appeal against judgment and order
dated 14/08/2013 rendered by 2nd Additional Sessions
Judge, Shajapur in Criminal Appeal No. 237/2012,
whereby conviction recorded against respondent by
learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shajapur, vide
judgment dated 28/04/2012 in Criminal Case No. 81/2010
with regard to offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881 has been reversed and respondent
has been acquitted.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
learned appellate Court has not properly appreciated the
evidence on record and has reversed the order of
conviction passed by the learned trial Court.

Per contra learned counsel for the respondent has
supported the impugned judgment of acquittal passed by
the learned appellate Court.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
impugned judgment and record of the trial Court.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
in the considered opinion of this Court, it is a fit case for
grant of leave to appeal against impugned judgment.
Accordingly, leave to appeal is granted.

Office to register the matter as a criminal appeal
and list in due course.

Respondent is directed to furnish personal bond and
surety bond each in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- to the
satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before this
Court till the pendency of the appeal.

Respondent-Vijay Kumar is directed to mark his
presence in the Office on 03/10/2017 and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this
behalf.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge
skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.17235/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for and is
granted time to comply with order dated 06/11/2017.

Be listed on 08/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.17362/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23740/2017x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.1165/2016x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after four weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.945/2011x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is
granted time on the ground that arguing counsel Shri Manoj
Soni is not available today.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1198/2014x
Indore dated:05/12/2017
Shri Sanjay Sharma, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
23697/2017, repeat (second) application under Section 389(1)
Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant No.4- Jeevanlal @ Jiwan for
suspension of custodial sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Section 325/34 of the IPC and has been sentenced to undergo 3
years R.I. and to pay fine of Rs. 3,000/-.

Initially vide order dated 25/08/2014, custodial sentence
imposed against applicant No.4-Jeevanlal @ Jiwan was
suspended by this Court, however, subsequently, he failed to
mark his presence before this Court, therefore, warrant of
arrest was issued against him for securing his presence before
this Court and eventually, he was arrested some times in
October, 2016 and sent to jail.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant
that in future the applicant shall regularly mark his presence
before the registry of this Court on all such subsequent dates,
which are fixed in this regard by the Registry.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the facts and
circumstances of the case, it would be appropriate to suspend
the custodial sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 23697/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by applicant No.4-Jeevanlal @
Jiwan in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only)
with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of
the learned trial Court for his appearance before the Court, the
execution of custodial part of the sentence shall remain
suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 19/04/2018 and
on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by
the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.806/2015x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
None for the applicant.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1272/2015x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.364/2016x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.947/2016x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Shri Anil OJha, learned counsel for the applicant.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
20518/2017, repeat (second) application under Section 389(1)
Cr.P.C. on behalf of applicant- Ramsingh for suspension of
custodial sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Section 307 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo 7 years R.I.
and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/-.

Learned counsel for the applicant has invited the
attention of this Court to para Nos. 37, 38, 39 and 41 of the
impugned judgment. It is submitted that the complainant and
accused persons have entered into compromise and that they
have peacefully and amicably settled their dispute, therefore,
custodial sentence imposed against applicant may be
suspended.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the fact that the
complainant and accused persons have already settled their
dispute, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 20518/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by the applicant in the sum of
Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a solvent surety
in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court
for his appearance before the Court, the execution of custodial
part of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the final
disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 29/01/2018 and
on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by
the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1193/2016x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant, list
after ensuing winter vacation.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1210/2016x
Indore dated : 05/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is
granted time on the ground that arguing counsel Shri Manoj
Soni is not available today.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1702/2016x
Indore dated:05/12/2017
Shri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicants.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
20371/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. on
behalf of applicant No.1- Nansingh for suspension of
custodial sentence.

The applicant has been found guilty for offence under
Sections 8(c)/ 20 (b) (II) of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act, 1985 and has been sentenced to undergo 7
years R.I. and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-.

learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicant
No.1-Nansingh is in jail for last 1 year and 4 months. It is also
submitted that the learned trial Court has not properly
appreciated the evidence on record and has recorded the
conviction without considering serious anomalies,
contradictions and omissions present in the testimony of
various witnesses. It is further submitted that co-accused
Ramesh, from whom allegedly 4 Kgs. of Ganja was recovered
has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated
29/08/2017. As regards the applicant, the allegation is that 9
Kg. of Ganja has been recovered from his possession. Lastly, it
is submitted that there is no apprehension of the applicant from
running away from the course of justice, if released on bail.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, considering the aforesaid broad
features of the case, without further commenting on the merits
of the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the custodial
sentence of the applicant.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 20371/2017 is allowed and it is
directed that subject to depositing fine amount and on
furnishing personal bond by applicant No.1-Nansingh in the
sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a
solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the
learned trial Court for his appearance before the Court, the
execution of custodial part of the sentence shall remain
suspended, till the final disposal of this appeal.

The applicant after being enlarged on bail, shall mark his
presence before the registry of this Court on 29/01/2018 and
on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard by
the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.78/2017x
Indore dated:05/12/2017
Shri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicants Sajid
Shah and Amit Kanjar.

Shri Manoj Saxena, learned counsel for the applicants
Modsingh and Suresh.

Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No. 8677/2017
and IA No. 19703/2017, repeat (third) applications under
Section 389(1) Cr.P.C. respectively on behalf of applicants-
Sajid Shah/Amit Kanjar and Modsingh/Suresh for
suspension of custodial sentence.

Each of the applicants has been found guilty for offence
under Sections 399 and 402 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo
3 years R.I. for each offence and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- with
usual default stipulation.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the parties that
the learned trial Court has not properly appreciated the evidence
on record and has recorded the conviction without considering
serious anomalies, contradictions and omissions present in the
testimony of various witnesses. It is also submitted that the
applicants were on bail during trial and the liberty so granted was
not misused by them. It is further submitted that there is no
apprehension of the applicants running away from the course of
justice, if released on bail. Lastly, it is submitted that the appeal
is likely to take time in its final hearing and if the short sentence
is not suspended then appeal shall be rendered infructuous.

Though prayer for suspension is opposed by the learned
Public Prosecutor, however, looking to the aforesaid facts and
circumstances of the case, without further commenting on the
merits of the case, it would be appropriate to suspend the
custodial sentence of the applicants.

Accordingly, I.A. No. 8677/2017 and IA No. 19703/2017
are allowed and it is directed that subject to depositing fine
amount and on furnishing personal bond by each of the
applicants- Sajid Shah, Amit Kanjar, Modsingh and Suresh in
the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs. Forty Thousand Only) with a
solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Court for their appearance before the Court, the execution of
custodial part of the sentence shall remain suspended, till the
final disposal of this appeal.

The applicants after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
their presence before the registry of this Court on 29/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard
by the Registry.

Listed for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1484/2017x
Indore dated : 28/11/2017
Shri Rohit Tomar, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Public Prosecutor for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
7661/2017, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation
Act for condonation of delay of 676 days in preferring this
appeal.

It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that he is in jail
since 22/11/2013 and that there was no one to file appeal on
his behalf, therefore, appeal could not be filed within time.

Considering the reasons assigned in the application
which is supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made
out to condone the delay.

Accordingly, IA No.7661/2017 is allowed and delay of
676 days in preferring this appeal is hereby condoned.

Also heard on the question of admission.
Appeal is admitted for final hearing.
Further heard learned counsel for the parties on I.A.
No.7659/2017, first application under Section 389(1) Cr.P.C.
on behalf of applicant-Jitendra for suspension of custodial
sentence.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave of this Court to
withdraw this application.

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, IA No. 7659/2017 is dismissed as
withdrawn.

List the appeal for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.897/2016x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners,
list after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.454/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.624/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.753/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Courts below be requisitioned.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.1306/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the appellants.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after three weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 1353/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the appellant.

By way of indulgence one week’s time is granted to the
learned counsel for the appellant to cure the defects pointed
out by the Office.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 2794/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Shri Sanjay Pathak, learned counsel for the petitioner.
On payment of process-fee within a week, let notice
be issued to respondent Nos. 1 on IA No. 21131/2017, an
application for condonation of delay and I.A.
No.19484/2017, an application for stay. Notice be made
returnable within 4 weeks.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.10945/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 552/2016x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
appellant/State.

Shri A.H. Qureshi, learned counsel for the respondent.
Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
20604/2017, an application under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C.
on behalf of respondent- Pankaj @ Tinku for grant of bail.

On due consideration I.A. No. 20604/2017 is allowed
and it is directed that on furnishing personal bond and surety
bond by the respondent each in the sum of Rs.40,000/- (Rs.
Forty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the learned trial
Court for his regular appearance before this Court, till the
pendency of this appeal, he shall be released on bail.

The respondent after being enlarged on bail, shall mark
his presence before the registry of this Court on 24/01/2018
and on all such subsequent dates, which are fixed in this regard
by the Registry.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 209/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Ms. Vinita Dwivedi, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
24072/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellant-
Kapil Jhava on 10/04/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellant.

Accordingly, IA No. 24072/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellant-Kapil Jhava on 10/04/2017 is hereby
condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellant,
appellant -Kapil Jhava is present today before this Court. He is
directed to mark his presence in the Office today and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this behalf.

Be listed for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No. 708/2016x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Shri Tarun Kushwaha, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri Rajesh Mali, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
21788/2017, an application for condoning absence of appellant-
Shantilal on 07/11/2017.

For the reasons assigned in the application which is
supported with the affidavit, sufficient ground is made out to
condone the absence of the appellant.

Accordingly, IA No. 21788/2017 is allowed and the
absence of appellant-Shantilal on 07/11/2017 is hereby
condoned.

As reported by the learned counsel for the appellant,
appellant -Shantilal is present today before this Court. He is
directed to mark his presence in the Office today and on all such
subsequent dates, as may be fixed by the Office in this behalf.

Be listed for final hearing in due course.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.6417/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned Public Prosecutor, list after a
week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.5022/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22491/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to file documents in support of the petition.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21640/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21744/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted four weeks’ time to argue the matter.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.21965/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22395/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22427/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.22633/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 22743/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Interim order has been passed by the co-ordinate
Bench.

Office is directed to examine and list the matter on
06/12/2017 before appropriate Bench.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 22937/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
on 05/12/2017 alongwith M.Cr.C. No. 22946/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23248/2017x
Indore, Dated :04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
weeks time to collect criminal antecedents of the petitioner,
if any.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23371/2017x
(Rahul Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Shri Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the
petitioner.

Shri Hemant Sharma, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23493/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23502/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23536/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23554/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners,
list after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23922/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24185/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is
granted time to argue the matter.

Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24382/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24414/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Shri Ashish Jaiswal, learned counsel for the
complainant/objector prays for and is granted time to file
document and written objection in the matter.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3538/2017x
Indore dated : 04/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Courts below be requisitioned.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.1033/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.1030/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.1025/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.1022/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.748/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.745/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.742/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

I.R. to continue till next date of hearing.
Certified copy as per rules.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.739/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5486/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted time
to comply with Section 15(A)(III) of SC/ST(PA) Act, 1989
so also to produce case-diary on next date of hearing.

Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.720/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners,
list in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No.3530/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Courts below be requisitioned.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5037/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the appellant, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5483/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Shri B.S. Soni, learned counsel for the appellant.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer for the
respondent/State.

Heard learned counsel for the parties on IA No.
23383/2017, an application for dispensing with procedure of
Chapter X Rule 53 of M.P. High Court Rules and Order.

On due consideration IA No. 23383/2017 is hereby
allowed .

Be listed after two weeks for consideration of IA No.
23382/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5466/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.A. No.5397/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Let record of the Court below be requisitioned.
Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Cr.R. No. 572/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
List alongwith M.Cr.C. No. 2402/2015.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 2402/2015x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
At the request of learned Public Prosecutor list on
06/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 9779/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioners,
list after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24658/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24698/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24664/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24765/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.7731/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 9838/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 17066/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 17819/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor further prays for and is
granted to comply with order dated 17/11/2017.

List after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 18449/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor is directed to comply with
order dated 30/10/2017.

Be listed in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 20347/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
in the next week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20843/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Vide order dated 21/11/2017 Station Incharge of the
concerned Police-Station was directed to remain present
before this Court on 29/11/2017. He is not present today.

He is again directed to remain present before this Court
on 08/12/2017 and to file affidavit stating therein reasons for
not producing the witnesses before the Court.

Be listed on 08/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.20853/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Status report of the trial Court is still awaited.
Office is directed to list the matter after a week
alongwith status report.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.23129/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
on 05/12/2017 alongwith M.Cr.C. No. 23429/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24468/2017x
(Sikandar @ Shikku Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Shri S.R. Golwalkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24489/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 24501/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
None for the petitioner.

The matter is adjourned by way of indulgence.
Be listed after a week.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
skt Judge
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No. 24565/2017x
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
As prayed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, list
after two weeks.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24585/2017x
(Rahul Vs. State of M.P.)
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Shri Ajay Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri K.K. Tiwari, learned Govt. Advocate for the
respondent/State.

After arguing at length on the merits of the case,
learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court
to withdraw this petition .

Prayer is granted.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24607/2017
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed thereafter.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
M.Cr.C. No.24414/2017
Indore dated : 01/12/2017
Parties through their counsel.
Learned Public Prosecutor prays for and is granted a
week’s time to produce case-diary.

Be listed on 11/12/2017.

(Ved Prakash Sharma)
Judge

skt