116
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 8653 of 2017 (O/M)
Date of decision : 11.1.2018
Simranjeet Singh ……. Petitioner
Versus
Anju ……. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
Present:- Mr. Vishal Yadav, Advocate, for petitioner.
1. Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not.
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?
-.- -.-
KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)
Petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 4.8.2017
(Annexure-P-4), passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court,
Barnala, vide which he was directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- per month as
maintenance pendent lite.
After hearing the learned counsel for petitioner, I am of the view
that keeping in view the prices of essential commodities, one can barely
survive with Rs. 6,000/- per month. There is no illegality or infirmity in the
quantum of maintenance, fixed by the Family Court, Barnala. Instant
revision is dismissed.
(KULDIP SINGH)
JUDGE
11.1.2018
sjks
Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes
Whether Reportable : No
1 of 1
15-01-2018 05:57:55 :::
