203 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
T.A. No.631 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : January 24, 2018
Navpreet Kaur ……. Petitioner
Versus
Ranjit Singh ……. Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH
Present:- Mr. G.S. Bhatia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate for
Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the respondent.
1. Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
see the judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not.
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?
KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)
Heard.
Petitioner seeks transfer of a petition filed under Section 25 of
the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, titled as “Ranjit Singh vs Navpreet
Kaur”, pending in the court of Shri Mohit Bansal, Addl. Civil Judge (Sr.
Divn.), Gurdaspur to a court of competent jurisdiction at Amritsar.
It is stated that two other cases between the parties, one under
the Protection of Women against Domestic Violence Act, 2005 and the
other criminal case, are already pending at District Courts, Amritsar.
Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances, the petition
filed under Section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, titled
as “Ranjit Singh vs Navpreet Kaur”, pending in the court of Shri Mohit
1 of 2
04-02-2018 22:34:43 :::
T.A. No.631 of 2017 (OM) -2-
Bansal, Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Gurdaspur, is withdrawn from his
court and is transferred to the court of learned District Judge, Amritsar, who
may retain the case himself or entrust it to a court of competent jurisdiction.
As such, the present petition is allowed.
(KULDIP SINGH)
JUDGE
January 24, 2018
sarita
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes
Whether Reportable: No
2 of 2
04-02-2018 22:34:44 :::
