SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ramkaran vs Priyanka on 25 January, 2018

CR 4436-2017 (OM) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CR 4436-2017 (OM)
Date of decision: 25.01.2018

Ramkaran
…..Petitioner
versus
Priyanka
……Respondent

CORAM: Hon’ble Mr.Justice Kuldip Singh

Present: Mr.Manoj Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.Anshul, Advocate for the respondent

1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the
judgment ?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Kuldip Singh, J. (Oral)

Petitioner is aggrieved of the order dated 4.5.2017 (Annexure

P1), passed by learned Additional District Judge, Kaithal, vide which,

pending the disposal of the petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955, the trial Court, while deciding application under

Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, awarded the maintenance

pendente lite @ Rs.18,000/- per month to the respondent-wife.

I have heard learned counsel for both the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed the petition only

on the quantum. It is contended that as per pay slip of the petitioner for the

month of June 2017 (Annexure P5), he is getting net pay of Rs.37,503/-.

His basic salary is Rs.61,300/-, out of which, a recovery of Rs.26,130/- is

being made and total entitlements comes to Rs.51,689/-. From the said

entitlements, further deductions of Rs.14,186/- is being made.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the net pay, the

1 of 2
05-02-2018 04:00:21 :::
CR 4436-2017 (OM) 2

interim maintenance is reduced from Rs.18,000/- per month to Rs.12,000/-

per month. Remaining part of the order is maintained.

The present revision petition is accordingly partly allowed.

However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of the petition

and dispose of the same maximum within one year.

Litigation expenses deposited in terms of the order dated

23.8.2017 passed by this Court be released to the respondent.

25.01.2018 (Kuldip Singh)
gk Judge

Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes
Whether Reportable: No

2 of 2
05-02-2018 04:00:22 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please to read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registrationJOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women centric biased laws like False 498A, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307,312, 313,323 376, 377, 406, 420, 506, 509; and also TEP, RTI etc

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh