SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sri. Ramanjinappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 8 February, 2018

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.354/2018
BETWEEN:

Sri Ramanjinappa
@ Ramanjaneyam
S/o Late Krishnappa
Aged about 55 years
R/o Banadapalya Village
Hebbur Hobli
Tumakuru Taluk and
Tumakuru District-572 120. … PETITIONER

(By Sri Rahul Rai K, Adv.)

AND:

The State of Karnataka
Though Women Police Station
Tumakuru
Represented by its State Public Prosecutor
High Court Building
High Court of Karnataka
Bangalore-560 001. …RESPONDENT

(By Sri K Nageshwarappa, HCGP)

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of the
Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.
No.99/2016 of Women P.S., Tumakuru District, for the
offences P/U/Ss 498A, 302, 114, 341 read with Section 149
of IPC.
2

This Criminal Petition coming on for orders this day,
the Court made the following:

ORDER

This petition is filed by the petitioner/accused

No.3 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking his release on

bail for the offences punishable under Sections 498A,

302, 114, 341 r/w Section 149 of IPC registered in

respondent – police station Crime No.99/2016.

2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner/accused No.3 and also the

learned High Court Government Pleader appearing for

the respondent-State.

3. I have perused the grounds urged in the bail

petition, FIR, complaint and other materials placed on

record.

3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has

produced the copy of the orders passed by this Court in

respect of accused No.1-Chikkaswamy, accused No.4-

Smt.Kanthamma and accused No.5-Naveen Kumar

granting bail to them. Perusing the said orders it is

seen that the entire merits of the case are taken into

consideration by this Court while granting bail to them.

Similar set of allegations are made even as against the

petitioner herein. It is no doubt true his earlier bail

petition came to be rejected observing that custodial

interrogation of the petitioner is necessary. From the

date of receipt till now he is in custody.

5. In view of the materials placed on record and

also the contention of the petitioner-accused No.3 that

he is innocent and false allegations are made against

him and that he is ready to abide by any reasonable

conditions to be imposed by this Court, it is a fit case to
4

exercise the discretion in favour of the petitioner even

on the ground of parity.

6. Accordingly, petition is allowed.

Petitioner/accused No.3 is ordered to be released on

bail for the offences punishable under Sections 498A,

302, 114, 341 r/w Section 149 of IPC registered in

respondent – police station Crime No.99/2016, subject

to the following conditions:

i. Petitioner shall execute a personal
bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and
furnish one surety for the likesum to
the satisfaction of the concerned Court.

ii. Petitioner shall not tamper with any of
the prosecution witnesses, directly or
indirectly.

iii. Petitioner shall appear before the
concerned Court regularly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

bkp

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation