SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Karamjit Kaur vs State Of Punjab on 5 February, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M-587-2018
Date of decision: 05.02.2018

Karamjit Kaur

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

…Respondent

*****

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

Present: Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate,
for the petitioner.

****

JAISHREE THAKUR, J. (ORAL)

This is 3rd petition that has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No. 116 dated

23.07.2013 under Sections 406/498A IPC, registered at Police Station City,

Kharar, SAS Nagar, Mohali.

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner

herein had been granted anticipatory bail by this Court by order dated

10.01.2014 passed in Criminal Misc. No. M-44009 of 2013. However, the

petitioner did not put in regular appearance as required and jumped bail

which resulted in cancellation of the interim protection granted. Thereafter,

she approached this Court by filing Criminal Misc. No. M-45552 of 2017,

however, the same was dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner herein has

been declared as a proclaimed offender, which was taken into account by

Addl. Sessions Judge, SAS Nagar, Mohali while declining her bail

1 of 2
12-02-2018 03:11:01 :::
CRM-M-587-2018 -2-

application by order dated 14.09.2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner

argues that the reason for not putting in an appearance after being granted

bail was on account of the fact that she had a paralytic stroke and could not

appear.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and this Court is

not inclined to grant relief to the petitioner at the present moment. However,

the petitioner herein is directed to surrender before the trial Court and move

appropriate application for setting aside the order declaring her proclaimed

offender as well as to move an application seeking anticipatory bail. In case,

an application is made, the same be decided expeditiously.

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

05.02.2018 (JAISHREE THAKUR)
Satyawan JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes.
Whether reportable No.

2 of 2
12-02-2018 03:11:02 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation