IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 11202 of 2018
DATE OF DECISION :- July 02, 2018
Sakuntala Rani …Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present:- Mr. P.B.S. Goraya, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Dhruv Dayal Sr. DAG, Punjab.
***
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner has since
joined the investigation. This fact is conceded by learned State counsel on
instructions from ASI Balwinder Singh. The F.I.R. has been registered for offence
under Section 498A IPC only and no offence under Section 406 IPC is there. The
petitioner is mother-in-law of the complainant and is aged about 60 years. Under
the circumstances, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not found to be
necessary.
Therefore, the interim bail granted to the petitioner on 16.3.2018 is
made absolute, subject to her fulfilling conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands allowed accordingly.
(H.S. MADAAN)
JUDGE
July 02, 2018
p.singh
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
1 of 1
08-07-2018 00:02:48 :::