SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Crime No. 684/2018 Of Muhamma … vs By Adv.Sri.P.V.Jeevesh on 27 June, 2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JULY 2018 / 19TH ASHADHA, 1940

Bail Appl..No. 4447 of 2018

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 2667/2018 of J.M.F.C.-II, CHERTHALA DATED
27-06-2018

CRIME NO. 684/2018 OF MUHAMMA POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA

PETITIONER(S)/2ND ACCUSED

SHABIN
S/O.SHAJI, AGED 32 YEARS, PUTHEZHATHUVELI VEEDU, VARANAM
P.O., THANEERMUKKAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH WARD-12

BY ADV.SRI.P.V.JEEVESH

RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :

STATE OF KERALA
THROUGH THE DEPUTY POLICE SUPERINTENDENT, CHERTHALA REP.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-
682031.

R BY SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. C.N.PRABHAKARAN.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-07-2018,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

AL/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, J.
————————————–
B.A.No.4447 of 2018
————————————-
Dated this the 10th day of July, 2018

ORDER

This application is filed under B’439 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure.

2. The applicant herein is the 2nd accused in Crime No.684

of 2018 of the Muhamma Police Station, registered under

B’B’498A 306 r/w.B’34 of the IPC.

3. The applicant herein is the mother of the 2 nd accused.

The 2nd accused had married Tesni on 23.4.2013 and they started

living together as husband and wife. The gold ornaments given to

Tesni by her parents were sold and using the proceeds, immovable

property was purchased. Later, when the 2 nd accused took steps

to assign the said property, it was objected to by Tesni. Dejected

by the acts of the accused, Tesni took her own life by hanging

herself. Alleging that the applicant along with his mother had

subjected the deceased to cruelty and had abetted the commission
B.A.No.4447 of 2018 2

of suicide, the aforesaid Crime was registered. The applicant

herein had surrendered before the investigating officer on

19.6.2018 and has been in custody.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant

submitted that the applicant herein is innocent. It is contended

that his wife was hypersensitive to ordinary petulance and except

for normal differences between spouses, there was no occasion for

her to take her own life. It is further urged that the allegation of

subjecting the lady to mental and physical harassment were raised

only much later.

5. Heard the learned Public Prosecutor and I have gone

through the case diary. It appears that the investigation has

progressed much. Having regard to the nature and gravity of the

allegations, the period of detention undergone and the stage of

investigation, I am of the view that the applicant can now be

enlarged on bail.

6. In the result, this application will stand allowed. The

applicant shall be released on bail on her executing a bond for

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties
B.A.No.4447 of 2018 3

each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having

jurisdiction. The above order shall be subject to the following

conditions:

1). The applicant shall appear before the Investigating
Officer on all Saturdays between 9 a.m. and 10 a.m.,
for 2 months or till final report is filed, whichever is
earlier.

2). The applicant shall not intimidate or attempt to
influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the
evidence.

3). The applicant shall not commit any offence while he
is on bail.

4) The applicant shall not leave India without the
permission of the Court and if having passport, shall
deposit the same before the Trial Court within a week;
If release of the passport is required at a later period,
the applicant shall be at liberty to move appropriate
application before the Court having jurisdiction.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the

jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application

for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance

with the law.

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.,
JUDGE
AL/-10/7. xx

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2018 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation