SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

An Application For Anticipatory … vs 1.Sampad Guhathakurta on 18 April, 2017

1

18.04.2017 C.R.M. 2826 of 2017.

OWED
60
c
In the matter of : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure filed on 5th April, 2017.

And

In the matter of : 1.Sampad Guhathakurta

2. Bula Guhathakurta.

Petitioners
Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra
….. For the Petitioners
Mr. Saibal Bapuli
Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya
…… For the State

Apprehending arrest in course of investigation of Kalyani Police Station FIR
No. 49 of 2017 dated 14.02.2017 under sections 498A/313/307/406/34 of the
Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have applied for anticipatory bail.

We have heard the learned advocates for the parties and perused the
materials in the case diary. It appears that the victim and the petitioner have
been married for the last 12 years but during such time their relationship as
husband-wife is anything but normal. It is also evident from the documents
annexed to this application that they are not in the best of physical condition and
termination of pregnancy could have been the outcome of some physical
disability.

That apart, there is insufficient material in the case diary to suggest direct
involvement of the petitioner no.2 (sister of the petitioner no.1) in the alleged
crime.

We are, thus, of the considered view that custodial interrogation of the
petitioners is not necessary for effective and meaningful investigation of the FIR
and that they are entitled to direction, as prayed for in the application.

CRM 2826 of 2017 stands allowed with the direction that in the event of
arrest, the petitioners viz. Sampad Guhathakurta and Bula Guhathakurta, shall
2

be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.5000/- (Rupees five thousand)
each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local to the
satisfaction of the arresting officer.

Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority
basis.

( Dipankar Datta, J.)

(Debi Prosad Dey, J. )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation