SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Pankaj & Ors vs State & Anr on 17 May, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 1478 / 2017

1. Pankaj Bhargav S/o Shri Leelaram Bhargav,, Aged About 30
Years

2. Leelaram Bhargav S/o Shri Jagdish Chandra Bhargav,, Aged
About 57 Years

3. Smt. Rma Devi W/o Shri Leelaram Bhargav,, Aged About 55
Years

4. Smt. Preeti Bhargav W/o Shri Ashok Bhargav,, Aged About 26
Years, All B/c Bhargav Joshi, R/o Opp. Laxmi Narayan Mandir
Street, Maderna Colony, Bhadwasiya Road, Jodhpur.

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. State of Rajasthan

2. Smt. Sunita W/o Shri Pankaj Bhargav D/o Shri Narendra Joshi,,
R/o House No. 378, Sector-14, Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Bishnoi.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit, PP for the State.
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
17/05/2017

It is stated at the Bar that a compromise signed by all the

parties is submitted with the present petition. It is borne out from

the compromise that complainant is not inclined to proceed further

in the matter. Learned counsel for the parties have placed

reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in case of Gian Singh

V/s. State of Punjab Anr. [(2012) 10 SCC 303].

It is also submitted that upon the aforementioned

compromise, the learned court below vide order dated 8.03.2017
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1478/2017]

acquitted the petitioner of the offences under Sections 406 IPC,

however, has not acquitted the petitioner of the offence under

Sections 498A of IPC.

In view of compromise arrived at between the parties as well

as the aforesaid order dated 8.03.2017 of the learned court below

and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh Vs. State of

Punjab Anr. (supra), I deem it just and proper to invoke

inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the present misc.petition is allowed and the

petitioner is acquitted of the offence under Sections 498A of IPC

as well, in relation to Criminal Original Case No.233/2013 pending

before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, (PCPNDT

Act Cases), Jodhpur.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

Ck mishra

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation