SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Abhinav Kant Bhatnagar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 18 July, 2017

CRM No.M-16737 of 2017 [1]


Criminal Misc. No. M- 16737 of 2017(OM)
Date of Decision: July 18 , 2017.

Abhinav Kant Bhatnagar …… PETITIONER(s)


State of Haryana and another …… RESPONDENT (s)


Present: Mr. M.S.Saini, Advocate for
Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Himmat Singh, DAG, Haryana.

Mr. Rose Gupta, Advocate
for respondent No.2.


Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.111 dated

02.03.2016 under Sections 498A/323/406/506/34 IPC registered at Police

Station Civil Line Hisar District Hisar and all other consequential proceedings

arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the parties.

The abovesaid FIR was registered at the behest of respondent No.2

due to matrimonial discord with her husband i.e., the petitioner. The matter has

been settled between the parties before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of

this Court, the terms and conditions of which were reduced into writing on

24.10.2016. The copy of settlement dated 24.10.2016 arrived at between the

1 of 4
22-07-2017 17:47:57 :::
CRM No.M-16737 of 2017 [2]

parties is on the file of this case (Annexure P2). The parties wish to live in peace

and harmony and put an end to the acrimony between them. The petitioner and

respondent No.2 have decided to part ways.

This Court on 12.05.2017 directed the parties to appear before

learned Illaqa Magistrate for recording their statements in respect to the above-

mentioned compromise. Learned Illaqa Magistrate was directed to submit a

report regarding the genuineness of the compromise, as to whether it has been

arrived at out of the free will and volition of the parties without any coercion,

fear or undue influence. Learned Illaqa Magistrate was also directed to intimate

whether the petitioner is absconding/proclaimed offender and whether any other

case is pending against him. Information was sought as to whether all affected

persons are a party to the settlement.

Pursuant to order dated 12.05.2017, the parties appeared before the

learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hisar and their statements were recorded

on 18.05.2017. Respondent No.2 stated that the settlement has been arrived at

out of her own free will without any kind of pressure or undue influence. It is

stated that she has no objection to the quashing of the abovesaid FIR qua the

petitioner. Statement of the petitioner in respect to the settlement was recorded

as well.

As per report dated 15.07.2017 received from the learned Judicial

Magistrate First Class, Hisar the compromise between the parties is opined to be

genuine without any kind of pressure or undue influence. The petitioner is not a

proclaimed offender. The statements of the parties are appended alongwith the

said report.

Learned counsel for the parties inform that the petition under

2 of 4
22-07-2017 17:47:58 :::
CRM No.M-16737 of 2017 [3]

Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 preferred by the petitioner and

respondent No.2 has since been allowed on 18.05.2017.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 reaffirms and verifies the

factum of settlement between the parties. It is submitted that the entire settled

amount due towards respondent No.2 has been received by her. It is reiterated

that respondent No.2 has no objection to the quashing of the abovementioned

FIR against all the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the State submits that as the abovesaid FIR

arises out of a matrimonial dispute, the State has no objection to the quashing of

this FIR on the basis of a settlement arrived at between the parties.

In Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and

another 2007 (3) R.C.R. (Criminal) 1052, a five member Bench of this Court has

observed as under:-

“The compromise, in a modern society, is the sine qua non of
harmony and orderly behaviour. It is the soul of justice and if the
power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code is used to
enhance such a compromise which, in turn, enhances the social
amity and reduces friction, then it truly is “finest hour of justice”.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court in B.S.Joshi and others v. State of

Haryana, 2003(4) SCC 675 has observed that it becomes the duty of the Court

to encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, it would be

in the interest of justice to quash the abovesaid FIR as no useful purpose would

be served by continuance of the present proceedings. It will merely lead to

wastage of precious time of the court and would be an exercise in futility.

This petition is, thus, allowed and FIR No.111 dated 02.03.2016

3 of 4
22-07-2017 17:47:58 :::
CRM No.M-16737 of 2017 [4]

under Sections 498A/323/406/506/34 IPC registered at Police Station Civil Line

Hisar District Hisar alongwith all consequential proceedings are, hereby,


July 18 , 2017. JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4
22-07-2017 17:47:58 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation