SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Abhishek Vinodkumar Verma vs State Of Gujarat & on 10 March, 2017

                    R/CR.MA/4980/2017                                                    ORDER




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

               CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING  SET ASIDE
                                     FIR/ORDER) NO. 4980 of 2017

         ==========================================================
                          ABHISHEK VINODKUMAR VERMA....Applicant(s)
                                          Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT  1....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR M.IQBAL A SHAIKH, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
         MR SHAKEEL A QURESHI, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 2
         MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

             CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA

                                             Date : 10/03/2017


                                               ORAL ORDER

1  Rule   returnable   forthwith.   Ms.   Pathak,   learned   Additional   Public 
Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent 
No.1­   State   of   Gujarat.   Mr.   Qureshi,   the   learned   advocate   has   entered 
appearance   on   behalf   of   the   respondent   No.2­   original   first   informant   and 
waives service of notice of rule.

2 By this application, the applicant ­ original accused seeks to invoke the 
inherent   powers   of   this   Court   under   Section   482   of   the   Code   of   Criminal 
Procedure, 1973, praying for quashing of the First Information Report bearing 
C.R. No.I­29 of 2014 registered with the Umra Police Station, District: Surat for 
the offence punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504 read with 114 of the 
Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 




                                                   Page 1 of 3

HC-NIC                                          Page 1 of 3      Created On Sat Mar 11 00:28:56 IST 2017
                    R/CR.MA/4980/2017                                                    ORDER




         3      Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, it is jointly submitted by 

the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties that the dispute has 
been amicably resolved between the parties and the respondent No.2 has no 
objection if the First Information Report is quashed. The respondent no.2 viz. 
Shilpaben is personally present in the Court and she is being identified by her 
learned advocate Mr. Qureshi. She has filed an affidavit dated 10th  February 
2017 inter alia stating as under:

“I, Shilpaben, wife of Abhishek Vinodkumar Verma  daughter of Hansraj  
Narayan Parvani, residing at 304, Swastik Woods, Vesu, Surat state on  
solemn   affirmation   that   I   have   filed   C.R.   No.I­29   of   2014   dated  
05.02.2014,  against  the  petitioners  herein,  before  Umra  Police  Station,  
Surat for the offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 114 of the IPC  
read with Sections 3  7 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Nevertheless the  
matter has amicably been settled and agreement of divorce has taken place  
between the parties. We having separated by agreement of divorce have no  
grudge against each other. I have no objection if the impugned complaint,  
charge   sheet   and   criminal   case   No.24760   of   2014   pending   before   the  
learned   Chief   Judicial   Magistrate,   Surat   are   quashed,   without   entering  
into merits.”

4 Taking into consideration the fact that the dispute between the parties 
has been amicably settled, no useful purpose would now be served to continue 
with the investigation. The affidavit is ordered to be taken on record.

5 In the result, this application is allowed. The First Information Report 
bearing C.R. No.I­29 of 2014 registered with the Umra Police Station, District: 
Surat is ordered to be quashed. Consequently, all further proceedings pursuant 
thereto stand terminated. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

6 The Registry shall accept the vakalatnama of Mr. Qureshi, the learned 
advocate who has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent no.2.



                                                  Page 2 of 3

HC-NIC                                         Page 2 of 3      Created On Sat Mar 11 00:28:56 IST 2017
                      R/CR.MA/4980/2017                                            ORDER




                                                                      (J.B.PARDIWALA, J.)
         chandresh




                                            Page 3 of 3

HC-NIC                                   Page 3 of 3      Created On Sat Mar 11 00:28:56 IST 2017
 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation