SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Abilal vs State Of Kerala on 31 December, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON

TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2019 / 10TH POUSHA, 1941

Bail Appl..No.9340 OF 2019

CRIME NO.471/2019 OF Erumapetty Police Station , Thrissur

PETITIONER/S:

ABILAL,
AGED 28 YEARS
S/O. KUNJUNNY, KARAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MUNDANCODE COLONY,
NELLUVAY VILLAGE, KUNNAMKULAM TALUK NELLUVAY P.O.
THRISSUR DISTRICT 680 584.

BY ADVS.
SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.)
SRI.P.M.RAFIQ
SRI.AJEESH K.SASI
SRI.M.REVIKRISHNAN
SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALLUNKAL
SRI.V.C.SARATH
SRI.VIPIN NARAYAN
SMT.POOJA PANKAJ
SRUTHY N. BHAT

RESPONDENT/S:

STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNAKULAM 682 031.

OTHER PRESENT:

SRI.T.R.RANJITH, PP

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
31.12.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No.9340 OF 2019 2

O R D E R

Dated this the 31st day of December 2019

Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.471/2019 of

Erumapetty Police Station for having allegedly committed

offences punishable under Sections 448, Section341, Section323, Section324, Section326,

Section506 and Section498A of the Indian Penal Code. The de facto

complainant is the wife of the petitioner and the injuries were

sustained by his parents in law. His mother in law had

fracture injury on her finger attracting offence under Section

326 of IPC.

2. The relationship between the petitioner and the de

facto complainant had strained and as a result of which the

de facto complainant was residing with her parents and for

some reasons petitioner had gone to his wife’s home which

resulted in the commission of aforesaid offence.

3. The petitioner may not required for custodial

interrogation and he is willing to co-operate with the

investigation. He has no other criminal antecedents. Under

the circumstances, he is directed to surrender before the

investigating officer within ten days and on doing so, he may
Bail Appl..No.9340 OF 2019 3

be arrested. On such event, he shall be released on bail on

execution of a bond for Rs.50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand

only) with two solvent sureties each to the like amount to

the satisfaction of the investigating officer. He shall not

attempt to influence or intimidate the witnesses. He shall

appear before the investigating officer as and when called for.

In case of breach of any of the conditions, the prosecution is

at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail before the

Jurisdictional Magistrate.

SD/-

ASHOK MENON
JUDGE
rmm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation