SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Aishwarya W/O Ravi Vijaykumar … vs Ravi Vijaykumar Mukhia on 25 November, 2019

C/SCA/11274/2019 ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11274 of 2019

AISHWARYA W/O RAVI VIJAYKUMAR MUKHIA D/O PANKAJBHAI
SHANTILAL SHUKLA
Versus
RAVI VIJAYKUMAR MUKHIA

Appearance:
MS KJ BRAHMBHATT(202) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS VARSHA BRAHMBHATT(3145) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
POOJA H BHARDWAJ(7844) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR RATHIN P RAVAL(5013) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

Date : 25/11/2019
ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate of the petitioner is absent. Mr. Rathin Raval,
learned advocate for respondent has tendered a copy of order
dated 11.11.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.
20822 of 2019 for quashing of the FIR for offence under
Sectionsection 498A of IPC. The order reads as under:

“Leave to amend.

Notice returnable on 17.2.2020. Learned APP waives service
of notice for the respondent – State. Meanwhile, no coercive
steps shall be taken against the applicants.

Considering the nature of relationship and dispute involved in
the matter, the parties are directed to explore possibility of
settlement through the Mediation Centre, High Court of
Gujarat.

Page 1 of 2

Downloaded on : Tue Nov 26 20:42:03 IST 2019

C/SCA/11274/2019 ORDER

Registry is directed to refer the subject matter of present
application to the Mediation Centre annexed with the High
Court of Gujarat for the purpose of exploring possibility of
settlement. Learned Mediator shall submit its report before this
Court on or before 23.1.2020.”

2. It is clear from the aforesaid order that considering the nature
of relationship and dispute between the parties, the matter is
referred to Mediation Center, High Court of Gujarat for
exploring possibility of settlement between the parties.
Learned Mediator is requested to submit the report on or
before 23.01.2020.

3. Mr. Raval urges the Court to keep the matter on 11.12.2019 so
that he can have a word with the learned advocate for the
petitioner in the interregnum period.

Hence, S.O. to 11.12.2019.

(A.G.URAIZEE, J)
JYOTI V. JANI

Page 2 of 2

Downloaded on : Tue Nov 26 20:42:03 IST 2019

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation