SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Ajay Sehgal & Ors vs State & Anr on 13 September, 2019

$~49
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 13.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4591/2019
AJAY SEHGAL ORS ….. Petitioners
Through: Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv.

versus

STATE ANR ….. Respondents
Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State
with ASI Chandar Pal Singh, PS –
Farsh Bazar, New Delhi

CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 35696/2019

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 4591/2019

2. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

49/2018 dated 16.02.2018, registered at Police Station – Farsh Bazar, New

Delhi instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of

the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 1 of 3

3. Notice.

4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the

present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 09.11.2013 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. One girl child was born out of the wedlock,

namely, Pehal Sehgal. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the

petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from

13.04.2017.

6. Divorce has taken place between the petitioner No. 1 and respondent

no.2 on 11.02.2019. Matter was referred to mediation centre where a

settlement deed dated 08.06.2018 was executed. Total settlement amount

came to ₹4,50,000/-. It is submitted that part payment of the settlement

amount is already received by the respondent No. 2. The balance amount of

₹50,000/- in cash is handed over to the respondent No. 2 today in Court.

7. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by SI ASI Chandar Pal Singh, Police Station – Farsh Bazar and

submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the

matter any further.

CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 2 of 3

8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the

petitioners any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 49/2018 dated 16.02.2018

registered at Police Station – Farsh Bazar, New Delhi instituted for the

offences punishable under Sections 498A/Section406/Section34 of the IPC and consequent

proceedings therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed accordingly.

11. Order dasti, under the signatures of Court Master.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)
JUDGE

SEPTEMBER 13, 2019
PB

CRL.M.C. 4591/2019 Page 3 of 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation