SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Akashdeep Singh Chauhan vs Ut Of Chandigarh & Anr on 16 October, 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.35616 of 2018
Date of decision: 16th October, 2019

Akashdeep Singh Chauhan
… Petitioner
Versus
UT of Chandigarh another
… Respondents

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH

Present: Petitioner in person along with
Mr. Jasraj Singh, Advocate.
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Addl. Public Prosecutor UT Chandigarh
for respondent No.1/State.
Respondent No.2 in person.

FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)

Report dated 31.01.2019 of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st

Class, Chandigarh has been received whereby after recording statements

of complainant Milli Nijjar alias Milli Chauhan and the accused namely

Akashdeep Singh Chauhan, the Court has shown its satisfaction that the

compromise has been arrived at voluntarily, out of free will of the parties,

without any undue influence, coercion or pressure.

Moreover, during the course of interaction with the parties,

they have shown their resolve to end the dispute and have made

statements that they have compromised the matter as per compromise

(Annexure P3) dated 11.03.2015 and shall abide by the same.

Heard.

1 of 2
20-10-2019 03:32:46 :::
CRM-M No.35616 of 2018 2

In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court and the fact

that the dispute between the parties being a pure matrimonial and the

offenses for which the accused has been hauled up are not of serious

nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in

ironing out differences for betterment of future life of the parties and in

view of the law laid down in ‘SectionGian Singh v. State of Punjab and

another’ 2012(4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and ‘SectionKulwinder Singh and

others v. State of Punjab and another’ 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal)

1052, the prayer made in the petition is allowed, proceedings by way of

FIR No.567 dated 10.12.2011 under Sections 406, Section498A IPC pertaining

to Police Station Sector 34, Chandigarh and all consequences arising out

of the said FIR including the order dated 28.01.2014 passed by Judicial

Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh qua the petitioner are quashed.

The petition stands disposed off in those terms.

(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
JUDGE
October 16, 2019
rps
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No

2 of 2
20-10-2019 03:32:46 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2020 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation